Categories: Insights, Case Law


1 May 2018

The right to have access to the records throughout the disciplinary procedure

With its judgement No. 7581 of 27 March 2018, the Court of Cassation has once again dealt with the delicate subject of the so-called right to have access to the records within a disciplinary procedure. In the case at issue, the judges ruling on the merits of the case held the dismissal notified to an employee to be unlawful. The employee had attended hearings for legal traineeship purposes, on days on which the employee proved to be absent for illness or present at work. In order to ground his own complaint, the employee claimed the employer’s refusal to make the documentation grounding the charge available, which was necessary in order to be able to correctly exercise the respective right of defence, since the facts dated back to the past and concerned occasional behaviours such as to prevent him from remembering the specific episodes. In upholding the ruling on the merits of the case, the Court stressed that, even if article 7 of Law No. 300/1970 did not weigh an obligation upon the employer to make the documentation available to the employee, against whom a disciplinary formal notice had been brought and on which the latter is based, the employer “must offer the consultation of the company documents to the person charged, where the examination of any such documents is necessary for the purpose of allowing the opposite party to have an appropriate defence, based on the principles of fairness and good faith in the performance of the contract”. The stance put forward fully complies with the principle pursuant to which the employee’s right of defence must not be limited within the scope of a disciplinary procedure, subject to the unlawfulness of the notified dismissal, if any.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…