Categories: Insights, Case Law


30 Sep 2015

Cassation Court 1 September 2015: succession of contracts and illegality of probation period

With its ruling no. 17371 of 1 September 2015, the Cassation Court established that a probation period cannot be included in the employment contract, if the hired employee had already performed an identical job at a different company, but that company had had the same contract. The judges further stated that regarding this principle, it was completely irrelevant if the jobs had a different name: what counts, are the actual contents of the duties given to the employee. Based on this, if the contents remain unchanged in the transfer from old to new employer – contractor – it is not possible to include a second probation period. Worthy of note is the explanation provided by the judges, according to which in cases of succession of contracts, this principle is only valid if the sector collective contract excludes the possibility for the enterprise taking over to hire personnel of the old enterprise in the same jobs with probation period.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

6 Feb 2026

Pay equity and transparency: draft implementing decree presented

Italy is among the first Member States to have adopted the draft implementing legislative decree of EU Directive 2023/970, which yesterday received its initial approval from the Council…

30 Jan 2026

A conviction for stalking can justify dismissal for just cause

With Ordinance No. 32952 of 17 December 2025, the Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, ruled that a final conviction for stalking and abuse can justify dismissal for just…

30 Jan 2026

We continue to be a Great Place to Work!

For the third consecutive year, De Luca & Partners has been awarded the prestigious Great Place to Work® certification, a significant recognition of the value we place on…

29 Jan 2026

Italian Supreme Court: Employer Monitoring and the Use of Corporate Chats for Disciplinary Purposes

Corporate chats “intended for work-related communications by employees accessing them through company accounts constitute work tools, pursuant to Article 4, paragraph 2, of Law No. 300 of 1970,…

28 Jan 2026

Anti-union conduct: the Supreme Court moves beyond formalism and focuses on substance

With order no. 789 of 14 January 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of anti-union conduct by employers in relation to information and consultation obligations on…

27 Jan 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the use of artificial intelligence may justify a dismissal for objective justified reason?

With Judgment No. 9135 of November 19, 2025, the Labour Section of the Court of Rome held that the dismissal for objective justified reason (i.e. “giustificato motivo oggettivo”,…