Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: rapporto di lavoro


1 Dec 2020

The validity of waivers and settlements within the employment relationship

The Supreme Court of Cassation, with its ruling no. 23385 of 23 October 2020, stated that regarding waivers and settlements, the employee’s declaration may be considered as a waiver if the settlement agreement was issued with awareness of determined or objectively determinable rights and with a conscious intent to waive or settle them.

Facts of the case

This case originated from an appeal filed by a manager of a public limited company, who was appointed company CEO in 1995. No specific remuneration was paid to the manager for this position. Having ceased to hold office, the manager applied to the Court of Venice asking for the payment of the remuneration, indicating as a quantification parameter the remuneration that had been determined in 1998 in favour of a new CEO.

The Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal rejected the manager’s request on the grounds that the remuneration issue was settled under an agreement reached between the parties on 17 September 1998, despite the fact that the text was unclear. The Court of Appeal considered that the settlement had definitively ended the management relationship and all matters relating to the CEO position, including remuneration. This decision assumed that when interpreting contracts, the agreement wording cannot be the only element to be considered but it must include other factors such as subsequent conduct, to identify the parties’ common intention.

The manager appealed to the Court of Cassation against the decision on the merits, complaining of an “unjustified” devaluation of the settlement agreement’s literal elements. He argued the parties had used the terms only in the singular and referred only to the management employment relationship, while there was no reference to the CEO position and no waiver of the related remuneration.

The Supreme Court of Cassation’s ruling

The Court of Cassation considered the appeal filed by the manager to be unfounded and referred to several basic principles regarding the interpretation of waiving and settlement acts concerning reciprocal rights deriving from the employment relationship.

Firstly, it was stated that “Regarding waivers and settlements, employment relationship and its termination, the employee’s declaration may be considered as a waiver provided that, based on the interpretation of the settlement agreement, it is ascertained it was issued with the awareness of determined or objectively determinable rights and with the conscious intent to waive or settle them. (see 10056/1991; Court of Cassation ruling no. 1657/2008).

According to the Court of Cassation the settlement agreement subject must be identified not by literal expressions used by the parties, but the objective situation of conflict that they have begun to settle through mutual concessions in the dispute and any dispute that they intend to prevent. To investigate the scope and content of a settlement agreement, the trial judge may draw on any element suitable for clarifying the agreement terms, even if not directly mentioned, without this entailing a violation of the principle according to which the settlement must be proved in writing (cf. 729/2003; Court of Cassation ruling no.  9120/2015).

The Court of Cassation stated that “on the general interpretation of contracts, if the literal expressions used are insufficient to reconstruct the common will of the parties, it is necessary to consider the common intent they have pursued.” To verify the nature of such a settlement agreement and its content, it is necessary to investigate whether the parties tried to end the dispute through the agreement. It is not necessary, however, for the parties to express their disagreement on the opposing claims, nor to use directly revealing expressions of the settlement agreement, the existence of which can be inferred from any element expressing the will to end any further dispute.

According to the Court of Cassation, the decision of the trial judges can only be considered legally correct and logically appropriate, thus avoiding any Court evaluation.

Insights related:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 marzo 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

16 Mar 2026

Illegitimacy of staff leasing due to violation of the principle of temporariness (Top 24 Lavoro, 27 febbraio 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alessandra Zilla)

With judgment no. 4493 of December 19, 2025, the Court of Milan addressed the issue of indefinite-term labor supply (so-called staff leasing). In particular, the Court clarified that,…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 marzo 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…

3 Mar 2026

Employee monitoring: when “bossware” becomes a legal risk (Agenda Digitale, 2 marzo 2026 – Martina De Angeli)

Monitoring workers through digital tools is a rapidly expanding practice, accelerated by the spread of remote work and the digital transformation of companies. Before adopting these systems, however,…

3 Mar 2026

Melismelis signs the campaign for the 50th anniversary of De Luca & Partners

For the historic labor law firm, the agency developed the 50th-anniversary logo and advertising campaign, managed online and offline media planning, and renewed the website’s visual identity. Milan,…

27 Feb 2026

Dismissals: the Corte costituzionale grants broader discretion to judges and greater scope for reinstatement (I Focus del Sole 24 Ore, 26 febbraio 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

The regulation of dismissals continues to represent one of the central pillars of Italian labour law, an area of constant tension between freedom of economic initiative and the…