Categories: Insights


31 Aug 2016

Court of Cassation: information due to the employer during an employee’s absence for sickness

With sentence no. 15226 dated 22 July 2016, the Court of Cassation rejected the petition of a female employee seeking to overturn the sentence of the court of Appeals which upheld her dismissal for disciplinary reasons i.e. absenteeism because of her failure to submit a medical certificate. In the account of the employee, she went to her GP to obtain an extension to the medical certificate, which had expired, but the GP was absent. His replacement sent the certificate to the INPS website. However, the judges of the lower courts ruled that (i) the employee had not promptly notified the employer of her absence, as specified in the national employment agreement for the sector, and (ii) the relevant certificate never reached the Institute [INPS] nor was any evidence provided that the replacement GP had attempted to send it. According to the Court, the concept of unjustified absence, cited in the letter of dismissal, does not refer only to «the lack of justification in an absolute sense» but also to «failure to notify the employer of the existence of the illness or its extension». Asking the GP for a certificate does not meet the requirement for diligence, since the employee is obliged to promptly to notify his/her absence to the employer and to verify the proper outcome of the online procedure and transmission of the sickness certificate. The employee, in fact, may only not send the hard copy form of the certificate, this obligation having been replaced by e-mail transmission by the GP to the Institute.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…

3 Mar 2026

Employee monitoring: when “bossware” becomes a legal risk (Agenda Digitale, 2 marzo 2026 – Martina De Angeli)

Monitoring workers through digital tools is a rapidly expanding practice, accelerated by the spread of remote work and the digital transformation of companies. Before adopting these systems, however,…

3 Mar 2026

Melismelis signs the campaign for the 50th anniversary of De Luca & Partners

For the historic labor law firm, the agency developed the 50th-anniversary logo and advertising campaign, managed online and offline media planning, and renewed the website’s visual identity. Milan,…

27 Feb 2026

Dismissals: the Corte costituzionale grants broader discretion to judges and greater scope for reinstatement (I Focus del Sole 24 Ore, 26 febbraio 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

The regulation of dismissals continues to represent one of the central pillars of Italian labour law, an area of constant tension between freedom of economic initiative and the…

27 Feb 2026

“Food delivery” once again at the center of inspection activities (Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto de Il Sole 24 Ore, 17 febbraio 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandro Ferrari)

It was recently reported that one of the leading food delivery operators in Italy has been placed under judicial supervision, ordered by an urgent decree of the Public…

26 Feb 2026

Vittorio De Luca at the Welfare & HR Summit 2026

On February 25, 2026, Vittorio De Luca took part in the sixth edition of the Welfare & HR Summit organized by Il Sole 24 Ore. In particular, our…