Categories: Insights, Practice

Tag: EDPB, GDPR, Linee Guida, videosorveglianza


2 Dec 2019

EDPB: Preliminary version of Guidelines 3/2019 on video surveillance

On 6 September 2019, the European Data Protection Board (“EDPB“) completed its public consultation on the document containing the draft of the forthcoming Guidelines 3/2019 concerning video surveillance (“Guidelines 3/2019 on processing of personal data through video devices“).

The images and audio tracks that are processed through the use of video surveillance systems, fall under the definition of “personal data” as they enable individuals to be identified, be it directly or indirectly. The processing of such information must therefore fully comply with EU Regulation 2016/679 – GDPR – on the protection of personal data and (in accordance with Italian law) and Legislative Decree 196/2003 as amended by Legislative Decree 101/2018 containing the rules for adapting national legislation to the said Regulation.

The aim that the European Committee intends to achieve with the issuance of these new Guidelines, is to ensure a uniform application of the legislation on video surveillance within all Member States of the European Union.

In view of the foregoing, it must first be made clear that the clarifications given in the draft concerning the legal basis on which the installation of the system is based are of fundamental importance.
In principle, it is possible that all the conditions for lawfulness set forth in Article 6, paragraph  1), of the GDPR are met, even if those most applied in practice are the legitimate interest that the Data Controller needs to pursue (Article. 6, paragraph 1), section f), GDPR) or the performance of a task in the public interest (Article 6, paragraph 1), section e), GDPR).

The European Committee clarifies that the Data Controller must specify in detail both the legal basis on which the data processing carried out is based and the detail of the purposes pursued. A system based on “security” in its simplest and most general sense is no longer a sufficiently detailed purpose.

Another important clarification concerns filming based on legitimate interest. Data processing is considered lawful only if this legal basis remains real, current and demonstrable at all times.

The Italian Data Protection Authority has, on several occasions, recommended that Data Controllers use the video surveillance tool in a proportionate and non-excessive manner and this approach can be found in the draft of the forthcoming Guidelines. Before proceeding with the installation of such systems, in fact, the Data Controller must use other tools (such as, for example, support by appropriate security staff, the provision of remote-controlled gates or adequate lighting) and demonstrate the effective need for the adoption of a video surveillance system. This, paying particular attention to limiting and defining, both temporally and geographically, filming in order to constantly respect the principle of minimisation of personal data pursuant to Article 5, point 1, section c) of the GDPR.

Each Data Controller is required to balance the interests involved by analysing, on a case-by-case basis, the legitimate interests of the Data Controller, on the one hand, and the fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subjects on the other.

In view of the above, the EDPB is awaiting the publication of the final text of the Guidelines, which are not only the first document to apply the principles of the GDPR to data processing carried out by video filming, but also, by national law, the first new document on the subject after the “Provision on video surveillance” issued by the Italian Data Protection Authority on 8 April 2010.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…