Categories: Insights, Publications


28 Mar 2019

VAT frauds expand the range of offences listed in Legislative Decree 231/01 (Newsletter Norme & Tributi n. 131 – Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica – Vittorio De Luca, Luciano Vella)

By 6 July 2019, Italy will have to adopt Directive (EU) 2017/1371 (the “PIF Directive”) on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests and approved on 5 July 2017 by the Parliament and European Council. Upon its adoption, VAT fraud will fall in the list of offences established by Legislative Decree 231/01. According to what is established by the PIF Directive, in fact, legal persons may be held liable for “serious offences against the common system of value added tax (“VAT”)” committed to their advantage or in their interest by top managers. A serious offence, specifies the PIF Directive, is deemed an offence that has transnational characteristics affecting two or more member states within the European Union. In addition, the damage against the financial interests of the European Union, for the offence to be defined serious and thus to lead to a penalty, must be at least in the amount of EUR 10,000,000. Among the penalties established by the PIF Directive there are interdictive as well as monetary penalties. Referring specifically to the prohibition penalties, they include the exclusion from entitlement to public benefits or aid, the temporary or permanent closure of establishments which have been used for committing the criminal offence all way to court-ordered compulsory administration or liquidation of the legal entity. This is a novelty of sure interest that will lead, most of all, to the necessary re-thinking of the MOG231 with subsequent updating. Moreover, this legislative intervention will allow the inclusion in the list of the predicate offences as per Legislative Decree 231/01 those offences that are specifically tax-related, reducing, at least in an abstract sense, in Court, the risk of dangerous case-law interpretations not yet anchored to typical regulatory data.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…