Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: Dismissal, Licenziamento, protezione dei dati personali


30 Oct 2025

Use of personal devices for business purposes. What are the employer’s risks?

The Spanish Data Protection Authority (i.e. “AEPD”) initiated sanction proceedings against a Spanish company belonging to an international group, following a complaint filed by a former employee.

The employee alleged that the company had added her personal mobile phone number to a corporate WhatsApp group, without her consent, for work-related purposes while waiting to receive a company phone – which she never actually received. Before taking a holiday, the employee had expressly notified the company by email that she would stop using her private number for work matters and had left the corporate WhatsApp group. However, only a few days later, her number was added again to a company group chat. The company argued that the inclusion was temporary, pending delivery of the business phone, and that WhatsApp groups were used solely for internal work communications among employees.

The AEPD, however, found that the use of the employee’s personal number without consent violated Article 6, paragraph 1, of the GDPR, which requires a lawful basis for any processing of personal data.

Legal basis and decision of the Authority

The Spanish Authority recalled that a personal mobile phone number is a personal data item, and that its use to include an employee in a corporate messaging group constitutes data processing which must rely on one of the legal bases set out in Article 6, paragraph 1, of the GDPR.

  • The GDPR requires that personal data be processed lawfully – Article 5 (1)(a).
  • For processing to be lawful, one of the following conditions must be met – Article 6 (1):
  • the data subject has given consent to the processing of their personal data for one or more specific purposes;
  • the processing is necessary for the performance of a contract to which the data subject is party, or in order to take steps at the data subject’s request prior to entering into a contract;
  • the processing is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject;
  • [omitted].

In the case under review, there was no consent from the data subject, nor any contractual necessity or other legitimate ground for processing. Moreover, the Spanish Authority stated that the existence of an internal company policy on the use of mobile devices does not exempt the employer from the obligation to establish a proper legal basis for processing.

The company was therefore fined €70,000, reduced to €42,000 after it acknowledged the violation and opted to pay the reduced amount. The AEPD also ordered the company to adopt corrective measures to ensure future compliance with the GDPR.

Bring Your Own Device

BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) policies are corporate rules governing the use of personal devices – such as smartphones, laptops, or tablets – for work-related purposes.

In practice, a BYOD policy sets out how employees may use their personal devices to access corporate data, emails, or applications, and defines the relevant security measures.

It is always preferable for companies to provide corporate devices and maintain a clear separation between personal and business tools. However, if the employer decides to allow employees to use personal devices for business purposes, a documented internal policy should be adopted, regulating:

  • cybersecurity requirements,
  • limits on use,
  • measures to protect employee privacy,
  • procedures for deletion of corporate data,
  • information and consent obligations (where applicable).

Other related insights:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 aprile 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 marzo 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

16 Mar 2026

Illegitimacy of staff leasing due to violation of the principle of temporariness (Top 24 Lavoro, 27 febbraio 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alessandra Zilla)

With judgment no. 4493 of December 19, 2025, the Court of Milan addressed the issue of indefinite-term labor supply (so-called staff leasing). In particular, the Court clarified that,…