{"id":22743,"date":"2014-06-19T22:00:00","date_gmt":"2014-06-19T20:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/news\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\/"},"modified":"2026-02-16T16:26:57","modified_gmt":"2026-02-16T15:26:57","slug":"constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/giurisprudenza\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\/","title":{"rendered":"Constitutional Court: article 32 of law 183\/2010 regarding forfeiture term for challenging a fixed term contract is lawful (il sole 24 ore, june 18, 2014, page 47)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">Constitutional Court, judgment no. 155 of May 21, 2014, stated the constitutional lawfulness of art. 32, par. 4, letter b), of Law 183\/2010, considering fully reasonable the choices taken by the legislator with reference to the Article 3 of the Constitution. Therefore, the challenging forfeiture term is applicable to the fixed term contracts (and not also to the coordinate and continuative collaboration relationships) already terminated as of the date in which the mentioned law came into force, i.e. November 24, 2010 and this provision is not in breach of treatment equality and reasonableness principles, set forth by the Constitution.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Constitutional Court, judgment no. 155 of May 21, 2014, stated the constitutional lawfulness of art. 32, par. 4, letter b), of Law 183\/2010, considering fully reasonable the choices taken by the legislator with reference to the Article 3 of the Constitution. Therefore, the challenging forfeiture term is applicable to the fixed term contracts (and not [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[190],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-22743","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-insights"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Constitutional Court: article 32 of law 183\/2010 regarding forfeiture term for challenging a fixed term contract is lawful (il sole 24 ore, june 18, 2014, page 47) - De Luca &amp; Partners<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22743\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Constitutional Court: article 32 of law 183\/2010 regarding forfeiture term for challenging a fixed term contract is lawful (il sole 24 ore, june 18, 2014, page 47) - De Luca &amp; Partners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Constitutional Court, judgment no. 155 of May 21, 2014, stated the constitutional lawfulness of art. 32, par. 4, letter b), of Law 183\/2010, considering fully reasonable the choices taken by the legislator with reference to the Article 3 of the Constitution. Therefore, the challenging forfeiture term is applicable to the fixed term contracts (and not [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/giurisprudenza\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"De Luca &amp; Partners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-06-19T20:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-02-16T15:26:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Melismelis\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Melismelis\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Melismelis\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/00d0832a12e3889dce887a31e29d65f8\"},\"headline\":\"Constitutional Court: article 32 of law 183\\\/2010 regarding forfeiture term for challenging a fixed term contract is lawful (il sole 24 ore, june 18, 2014, page 47)\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-06-19T20:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-16T15:26:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":112,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Insights\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\\\/\",\"name\":\"Constitutional Court: article 32 of law 183\\\/2010 regarding forfeiture term for challenging a fixed term contract is lawful (il sole 24 ore, june 18, 2014, page 47) - De Luca &amp; Partners\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2014-06-19T20:00:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-02-16T15:26:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/giurisprudenza\\\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Constitutional Court: article 32 of law 183\\\/2010 regarding forfeiture term for challenging a fixed term contract is lawful (il sole 24 ore, june 18, 2014, page 47)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"De Luca & Partners\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"De Luca & Partners\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/De-Luca-Partners.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/De-Luca-Partners.png\",\"width\":600,\"height\":56,\"caption\":\"De Luca & Partners\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/00d0832a12e3889dce887a31e29d65f8\",\"name\":\"Melismelis\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/abc81b0c708aea145c773c368ae5bc3f1f3fd0d40a61429cb96d09523d41ab66?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/abc81b0c708aea145c773c368ae5bc3f1f3fd0d40a61429cb96d09523d41ab66?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/abc81b0c708aea145c773c368ae5bc3f1f3fd0d40a61429cb96d09523d41ab66?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Melismelis\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Constitutional Court: article 32 of law 183\/2010 regarding forfeiture term for challenging a fixed term contract is lawful (il sole 24 ore, june 18, 2014, page 47) - De Luca &amp; Partners","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22743\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Constitutional Court: article 32 of law 183\/2010 regarding forfeiture term for challenging a fixed term contract is lawful (il sole 24 ore, june 18, 2014, page 47) - De Luca &amp; Partners","og_description":"Constitutional Court, judgment no. 155 of May 21, 2014, stated the constitutional lawfulness of art. 32, par. 4, letter b), of Law 183\/2010, considering fully reasonable the choices taken by the legislator with reference to the Article 3 of the Constitution. Therefore, the challenging forfeiture term is applicable to the fixed term contracts (and not [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/giurisprudenza\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\/","og_site_name":"De Luca &amp; Partners","article_published_time":"2014-06-19T20:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-02-16T15:26:57+00:00","author":"Melismelis","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Melismelis"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/giurisprudenza\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/giurisprudenza\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\/"},"author":{"name":"Melismelis","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/00d0832a12e3889dce887a31e29d65f8"},"headline":"Constitutional Court: article 32 of law 183\/2010 regarding forfeiture term for challenging a fixed term contract is lawful (il sole 24 ore, june 18, 2014, page 47)","datePublished":"2014-06-19T20:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-16T15:26:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/giurisprudenza\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\/"},"wordCount":112,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Insights"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/giurisprudenza\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\/","url":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/giurisprudenza\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\/","name":"Constitutional Court: article 32 of law 183\/2010 regarding forfeiture term for challenging a fixed term contract is lawful (il sole 24 ore, june 18, 2014, page 47) - De Luca &amp; Partners","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2014-06-19T20:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-02-16T15:26:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/giurisprudenza\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/giurisprudenza\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/giurisprudenza\/constitutional-court-article-32-of-law-183-2010-regarding-forfeiture-term-for-challenging-a-fixed-term-contract-is-lawful-il-sole-24-ore-june-18-2014-page-47\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Constitutional Court: article 32 of law 183\/2010 regarding forfeiture term for challenging a fixed term contract is lawful (il sole 24 ore, june 18, 2014, page 47)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/","name":"De Luca & Partners","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#organization","name":"De Luca & Partners","url":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/De-Luca-Partners.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/De-Luca-Partners.png","width":600,"height":56,"caption":"De Luca & Partners"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/00d0832a12e3889dce887a31e29d65f8","name":"Melismelis","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/abc81b0c708aea145c773c368ae5bc3f1f3fd0d40a61429cb96d09523d41ab66?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/abc81b0c708aea145c773c368ae5bc3f1f3fd0d40a61429cb96d09523d41ab66?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/abc81b0c708aea145c773c368ae5bc3f1f3fd0d40a61429cb96d09523d41ab66?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Melismelis"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it"]}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22743","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22743"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22743\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":22744,"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22743\/revisions\/22744"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22743"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22743"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22743"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}