{"id":31632,"date":"2026-04-27T21:28:59","date_gmt":"2026-04-27T19:28:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/news\/naspi-e-dimissioni-per-trasferimento-oltre-50km\/"},"modified":"2026-05-04T09:21:19","modified_gmt":"2026-05-04T07:21:19","slug":"unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/","title":{"rendered":"Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer\u2019s breach must be proven\u00a0\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e.&nbsp;\u201c<em>NASpI<\/em>\u201d) in the context of resignations for just cause following an employee\u2019s transfer. The Court held that entitlement to&nbsp;NASpI&nbsp;in the event of resignation requires that the resignation qualifies as for just cause under Article 3(2) of Legislative Decree no. 22\/2015, which presupposes circumstances attributable to the employer amounting to a serious breach (or conduct capable of making the continuation of the employment relationship, even on a temporary basis, intolerable). Therefore, the mere fact of a significant distance resulting from the transfer of the workplace is not sufficient, in itself, to&nbsp;establish&nbsp;just cause for resignation and the resulting involuntary unemployment.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts of the case<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The dispute originated from a claim brought by an employee seeking unemployment benefits following his resignation for just cause, allegedly due to the transfer of his workplace ordered by the employer.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At first instance, the competent Court rejected the employee\u2019s claim.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Subsequently, the Court of Appeal of Genoa, with judgment no. 50\/2025, overturned the first-instance decision and upheld the employee\u2019s claim. The appellate court held that the relocation of the workplace to a considerable distance (from Genoa to Catania), exceeding 50 km from the employee\u2019s residence,&nbsp;was&nbsp;in itself&nbsp;sufficient&nbsp;to constitute just cause for resignation. According to the Court of Appeal, this situation amounted to a \u201c<em>serious objective circumstance preventing the continuation of the employment relationship<\/em>\u201d,&nbsp;irrespective of the need to&nbsp;establish&nbsp;an actual breach by the employer.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"638\" src=\"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing-1024x638.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-29579\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing-1024x638.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing-300x187.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing-768x478.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing-1536x957.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>The decision of the Italian Supreme Court<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Italian Social Security Institute&nbsp;(i.e. \u201c<em>INPS<\/em>\u201d)&nbsp;challenged the judgment before the Supreme Court, arguing that the Court of Appeal had erred in&nbsp;recognising&nbsp;just cause for resignation without first verifying the unlawfulness of the transfer, namely the absence of the \u201c<em>proven technical,&nbsp;organisational&nbsp;and production-related reasons<\/em>\u201d which, under Article 2103 of the Italian Civil Code, justify an employer\u2019s transfer decision. According to INPS, only an unlawful transfer may&nbsp;constitute&nbsp;a serious breach by the employer capable of justifying resignation for just cause and,&nbsp;consequently, entitlement to&nbsp;NASpI.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Court upheld INPS\u2019s appeal. The Court clarified that,&nbsp;in order to&nbsp;obtain&nbsp;NASpI&nbsp;following resignation, a mere situation of difficulty is not sufficient; rather, the resignation must qualify as for just cause under Article 2119 of the Italian Civil Code. This notion requires a circumstance that does not allow the continuation, even temporarily, of the employment&nbsp;relationship&nbsp;and that is attributable to a serious breach of contractual obligations by the employer.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court held that the Court of Appeal erred in relying exclusively on the objective element of the significant distance of the new workplace, without carrying out the essential assessment of the existence of an employer\u2019s breach. Indeed, entitlement to unemployment benefits is excluded where the employee voluntarily resigns despite having the possibility to continue the employment relationship. In the context of a transfer, such&nbsp;possibility&nbsp;exists where the transfer is lawful, namely supported by valid technical,&nbsp;organisational&nbsp;and production-related reasons.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Accordingly, the Supreme Court held that,&nbsp;in order to&nbsp;recognise&nbsp;entitlement to&nbsp;NASpI, the lower court should have assessed whether the transfer was unlawful and thus constituted a breach by the employer capable of undermining the relationship of trust and making the continuation of the employment relationship intolerable.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For these reasons, the Supreme Court set aside the appealed judgment and remitted the case to the Court of Appeal of Genoa, in a different composition, for a new assessment on the merits in line with the principles set out above.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Note<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It should be noted that, with message no. 369 of 26 January 2018, INPS had&nbsp;summarised&nbsp;certain principles regarding involuntary unemployment for the purposes of granting unemployment benefits,&nbsp;recognising&nbsp;entitlement also in cases where the employment relationship is terminated by mutual agreement following the employee\u2019s refusal to accept a transfer to another workplace more than 50 km from the employee\u2019s residence or requiring more than 80 minutes to reach by public transport.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">INPS therefore\u00a0recognises\u00a0entitlement to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/court-of-turin-the-right-to-naspi-in-the-case-of-resignation-due-to-transfer\/\">NASpI\u00a0<\/a>in the case of mutual termination following a transfer, but not in the case of resignation for just cause due to a transfer (unless the employer\u2019s breach is proven in court).\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the order under review, the Supreme Court aligned with the principles set out by INPS.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, it should be noted that a recent line of first-instance case law (Court of Milan, judgment no. 4400 of 9 October 2024; Court of Reggio Calabria, judgment no. 1663 of 13 December 2024; Court of Catania, judgment no. 973 of 4 March 2025; Court of Monza, judgment no. 582 of 6 May 2025) has adopted a more substantive and opposite approach compared to the decision under review,&nbsp;recognising&nbsp;entitlement to&nbsp;NASpI&nbsp;also in cases of resignation for just cause following a transfer, without requiring proof of the employer\u2019s breach.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The main argument underlying this line of case law is the potential discriminatory treatment compared to the case of mutual termination, which is expressly&nbsp;recognised&nbsp;by INPS. Indeed, INPS grants&nbsp;NASpI&nbsp;to employees who&nbsp;terminate&nbsp;the relationship by mutual agreement following refusal of a transfer beyond 50 km \/ 80 minutes.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Case law has therefore held that there is no logical reason to treat&nbsp;differently an employee\u2019s resignation&nbsp;based on the same objective circumstances of hardship, as compared to mutual termination. In both cases, the employee\u2019s decision to&nbsp;terminate&nbsp;the relationship is not entirely voluntary, but rather \u201cinduced\u201d by a unilateral decision of the employer leading to a \u201csignificant change in working conditions\u201d.&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e.&nbsp;\u201cNASpI\u201d) in the context of resignations for just cause following an employee\u2019s transfer. The Court held that entitlement to&nbsp;NASpI&nbsp;in the event of resignation requires that the resignation qualifies as for just cause under Article 3(2) of Legislative [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":29580,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[177,191,196],"tags":[849,1415],"class_list":["post-31632","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insights","category-legislation","category-news","tag-labour","tag-naspi-en"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km\u00a0\u00a0 - De Luca &amp; Partners<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e.\u00a0\u201cNASpI\u201d) in the context of resignations for just cause following an employee\u2019s transfer.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31632\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km\u00a0\u00a0 - De Luca &amp; Partners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e.\u00a0\u201cNASpI\u201d) in the context of resignations for just cause following an employee\u2019s transfer.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"De Luca &amp; Partners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-27T19:28:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-04T07:21:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1196\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"De Luca &amp; Partners\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"De Luca &amp; Partners\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"De Luca &amp; Partners\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5063c2767f84784e68821af018b50526\"},\"headline\":\"Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer\u2019s breach must be proven\u00a0\u00a0\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-27T19:28:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-04T07:21:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":997,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/09\\\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Labour\",\"NASPI\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Insights\",\"Legislation\",\"News\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\\\/\",\"name\":\"Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km\u00a0\u00a0 - De Luca &amp; Partners\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/09\\\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-27T19:28:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-04T07:21:19+00:00\",\"description\":\"With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e.\u00a0\u201cNASpI\u201d) in the context of resignations for just cause following an employee\u2019s transfer.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/09\\\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/09\\\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing.jpg\",\"width\":1920,\"height\":1196},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/insights\\\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer\u2019s breach must be proven\u00a0\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/\",\"name\":\"De Luca & Partners\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"De Luca & Partners\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/De-Luca-Partners.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/De-Luca-Partners.png\",\"width\":600,\"height\":56,\"caption\":\"De Luca & Partners\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.delucapartners.it\\\/en\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/5063c2767f84784e68821af018b50526\",\"name\":\"De Luca &amp; Partners\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a610059c0158817ae9ff902a78b90137e46a77a581528c01a749f3ff305b16f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a610059c0158817ae9ff902a78b90137e46a77a581528c01a749f3ff305b16f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/a610059c0158817ae9ff902a78b90137e46a77a581528c01a749f3ff305b16f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"De Luca &amp; Partners\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km\u00a0\u00a0 - De Luca &amp; Partners","description":"With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e.\u00a0\u201cNASpI\u201d) in the context of resignations for just cause following an employee\u2019s transfer.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31632\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km\u00a0\u00a0 - De Luca &amp; Partners","og_description":"With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e.\u00a0\u201cNASpI\u201d) in the context of resignations for just cause following an employee\u2019s transfer.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/","og_site_name":"De Luca &amp; Partners","article_published_time":"2026-04-27T19:28:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-04T07:21:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1196,"url":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"De Luca &amp; Partners","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"De Luca &amp; Partners","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/"},"author":{"name":"De Luca &amp; Partners","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5063c2767f84784e68821af018b50526"},"headline":"Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer\u2019s breach must be proven\u00a0\u00a0","datePublished":"2026-04-27T19:28:59+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-04T07:21:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/"},"wordCount":997,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing.jpg","keywords":["Labour","NASPI"],"articleSection":["Insights","Legislation","News"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/","url":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/","name":"Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km\u00a0\u00a0 - De Luca &amp; Partners","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing.jpg","datePublished":"2026-04-27T19:28:59+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-04T07:21:19+00:00","description":"With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e.\u00a0\u201cNASpI\u201d) in the context of resignations for just cause following an employee\u2019s transfer.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/HRO-\u2013-HR-Outsourcing.jpg","width":1920,"height":1196},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/insights\/unemployment-benefits-and-resignation-following-transfer-beyond-50-km\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer\u2019s breach must be proven\u00a0\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/","name":"De Luca & Partners","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#organization","name":"De Luca & Partners","url":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/De-Luca-Partners.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/De-Luca-Partners.png","width":600,"height":56,"caption":"De Luca & Partners"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/5063c2767f84784e68821af018b50526","name":"De Luca &amp; Partners","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a610059c0158817ae9ff902a78b90137e46a77a581528c01a749f3ff305b16f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a610059c0158817ae9ff902a78b90137e46a77a581528c01a749f3ff305b16f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a610059c0158817ae9ff902a78b90137e46a77a581528c01a749f3ff305b16f2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"De Luca &amp; Partners"}}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31632","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31632"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31632\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31671,"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31632\/revisions\/31671"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29580"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31632"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31632"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.delucapartners.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31632"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}