Court of cassation, with sentence of September 30, 2013, no. 22321, stated that the ten-year blameless behavior and the will of refunding the damage caused to the employer save the employee who pockets the reimbursement of a trip never done from the dismissal. The Supreme Court modified the decision of the Court of Appeal upholding the appeal of the employee due to the lack of a full evidence on his/her bad faith and to the diligence with which the employee ever complied with his/her obligations.
