Catégories: News


28 Déc 2014

JOBS ACT: THE ACT ISSUED BY GOVERNMENT UNDER PARLIAMENTARY DELEGATION TAKES SHAPE

The night before Christmas, the Italian Government has approved the first of the decrees meant to implement the reform legislation approved by the Parliament by the beginning of December, affirmed as aimed at deeply reforming the most sensitive aspects of Italian employment law (i.e., mainly shock absorbers, dismissals and incentives to employment and re-employment). For sure the implementation decree in question, ruling a new discipline applicable to dismissals, is the most awaited Decree among the others which the Government has announced to pass quickly.



The “original” discipline of dismissals, passed in 1970 and debated for decades thereafter, had already found its first attempt to reformation in 2012, after the Monti premiership. With this decree, the present Government seem to overpass in several aspects such previous reformation. However, differently from it, it did not change the rules for those who benefit of the “old” discipline already, excluding from its applicability those who are already hired by employers staffed with more than 15 employees, this representing a undoubtable limitation to the immediate impact of the decree on a significant portion of employers/employees already engaged in an employment relationship.



The new rules will be applicable from the effective date of the Decree, which is forecasted for January 2015.



The following are the main changes regarding safeguards for employees who have been unlawfully dismissed.



a)    Increasing benefits



Without prejudice to those remaining cases in which employees’ security applies (see letter c) below), in those cases where dismissal for disciplinary or financial reasons has been declared unlawful the employee in question shall be due financial compensation only.



The amount of such compensation shall be based on the cause of unlawful dismissal, the size of the company or undertaking, and the years of service of the employee (“a tutele crescenti”, progressively increasing safeguards), and more specifically:



i.    in most cases: 2 months’ pay for each year of service, up to a maximum of 24 months’ pay and subject to a minimum of 4 months’ pay;

ii.   in cases of inadequate grounds for dismissal, or of the lack of the due disciplinary procedure: one month’s pay for each year of service up to a maximum of 12 months’ pay and subject to a minimum of 2 months’ pay;

iii.  in the case of small companies (with no more than 15 employees): the compensation is halved and may not exceed the upper limit of 6 months’ pay.



b)    Deflationary measures: rapid settlement and the annulment of dismissal



In order to encourage the rapid settlement of disputes, it has been established that within the deadline for challenging dismissal out of court (60 days), the employer, in order to avoid legal proceedings, may offer the dismissed employee one month’s pay for each year of service up to a maximum of 18 months’ pay and subject to a minimum of 2 months’ pay. 

Furthermore, in the event of annulment of dismissal within the term of fifteen days following notification of the challenge to such, the employee shall be seamlessly reinstated and shall be entitled to any pay that has accrued, without application of the penalties provided for by the decree.



c)    When reinstatement continues to apply



The decree confirms the reinstatement of the employee in cases of discriminatory or invalid dismissal, or dismissal notified verbally, and in the event of dismissal on disciplinary grounds, in the case of inexistence of the claimed act or fact given as grounds for dismissal.




Inscrivez-vous à notre lettre d’information

Contacts

Vous avez besoin d'informations ? Écrivez-nous et notre équipe d'experts vous répondra dans les plus brefs délais.

Remplissez le formulaire

Autres nouveautés et insights

1 Oct 2026

E-mail professionnelle et contrôles défensifs : quand le RGPD et le droit du travail ne coïncident pas

L’affaire Piaggio illustre de manière particulièrement évidente comment, face aux mêmes faits, des appréciations profondément différentes peuvent coexister selon la perspective adoptée. Par une décision du 13 juin…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI et réintégration : le choix du salarié entraîne la perte de l’allocation

Sommaire La Cour de cassation, par son récent arrêt n° 24981 du 3 septembre 2026, a jugé que, lorsqu’un licenciement est annulé avec ordre de réintégration en application…

1 Oct 2026

Saviez-vous que… un témoignage rendu en justice peut avoir une portée disciplinaire et, dans les cas les plus graves, justifier un licenciement ?

La Cour de cassation italienne, section Travail, par son ordonnance n° 25687 du 22 septembre 2026, s’est prononcée sur la portée disciplinaire des déclarations faites par un salarié…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI en entreprise : comment maîtriser les risques, les données et la sécurité (Agenda digitale, 29 Septembre 2026 – Vittorio De Luca et Martina De Angeli)

La diffusion d’outils d’intelligence artificielle utilisés sans autorisation de l’entreprise expose les organisations à des risques liés aux données personnelles, aux informations confidentielles, au savoir-faire et à la…

24 Sep 2026

Le concept de « territoire » dans le cadre de la clause de non-concurrence (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca et Alessandro Ferrari)

Les problématiques d’interprétation à la lumière de la jurisprudence la plus récente en matière de nullité de la clause de non-concurrence pour imprécision de la limitation territoriale Par…

16 Sep 2026

Le saviez-vous… La violation répétée des procédures internes de l’entreprise peut justifier le licenciement du responsable d’un point de vente ?

La Cour de cassation, chambre sociale, par l’ordonnance n° 25231 du 11 septembre 2026, a confirmé la légalité du licenciement pour faute grave prononcé à l’encontre d’une responsable…