Le Centre d’étude de De Luca & Partners gère et coordonne les activités de recherche, de formation (interne et externe) et les activités éditoriales en matière de droit du travail, de protection des données personnelles et de responsabilité administrative des personnes morales.
De Luca & Partners investit en effet dans l’étude et la diffusion de sujets relevant de sa compétence et collabore à ce titre avec le journal italien Sole 24 Ore et avec les principales revues et publications spécialisées.
Court of Cassation, with sentence no. 26143 filed on November 21, stated that the recording of colleagues’ conversations, unknown to them, is a reason justifying dismissal, though the recording was aimed at proving “mobbing”.
The Ministry of Labour, with the ruling no. 32/2013 to Confimi’s question, summarized the legal framework for the agents in respect to Enasarco compulsory registration, stating that, in compliance with EU regulation, the agent who performs his/her activity abroad for a duration not exceeding 24 months, has to be enrolled in Enasarco register.
The Court of Cassation, with sentence no. 24259 of October 28, stated that the outsourcing of the most qualified activities of a service, in case of employee’s refusal to be seconded to the external company or to perform a different task corresponding to his/her job position, is able to legitimize the dismissal if alternative positions suitable for him/her in the same company do not exist.
Una cassiera del supermarket perde il lavoro perché si porta a casa i premi previsti per i clienti. Il licenziamento è legittimo, ha confermato la Corte di Cassazione, sezione lavoro, con sentenza n. 24588/13, respingendo le osservazioni della lavoratrice la quale aveva contestato la mancata esposizione, nel luogo di lavoro, del codice disciplinare.
The Stability Law 2013 did not only exclude the possibility for employees dismissed for objective reason by small companies (hired less than 15 employees) to be enrolled in the mobility lists but, above all, did not refinance the incentive in favour of such employees.
The Commission for the questions related to the safety on work, in the note no. 8/2013, specified that prior medical examination required by the Legislative Decree no. 81/2008 for the suitability assessment of the employee to the specific duty is valid for one year only
Court of Cassation, with sentence no. 20913 of September 12, 2013, stated that technical, organizational and productive reasons justifying the transfer of the employee must be described in detail and must not be generic.
INPS, with message 16961 of October 22, provided some clarifications about the special indemnity granted to project employees (so called “co.co.pro.”) by Fornero Reform.
