Case Law

The Court of Milan, with reference to the legitimacy of a fixed-term contract for substitutive reasons, with sentence no. 5020 of October 25, 2011 clarified that the fixed-term hiring contract for the substitution of an employee in maternity leave is valid also when the absence reasons change (in this particular case, the absence continued for holidays).

Through sentence no. 37398 of October 17, 2011, the VI Criminal Section of the Court of Cassation stated that the employee who, in order to avoid liberty restriction (incrimination and employment loss), gives false declarations that allow the employer to elude investigations, is not punishable for aiding and abetting.

Should the fixed term employment contract be null and void, the employee is not entitled to obtain the conversion into an open ended employment contract because the nullity of the provision which sets the duration carries away the entire contract.

Court of Cassation, with order no. 19119/2011, stated that, with reference to the damage, the proof of the amount paid shall be provided through the income tax return or, related to the past profits, the proof by witnesses on the activity performed, pointing out circumstances which could justify the assumption based on which the lack of income is due to extraordinary and temporary conditions.

The Court of Cassation, with sentence No. 17093/2011, declared that the judge, on the one hand, has to interpret the flexibility that the provision concerning the dismissal for “justified subjective reason” offered him (as well as for “just cause”) in order to adapt it to a social context which develops continuously; on the other hand, however, the judge’s evaluation of the future reliability of the employee, on which the decision to deny the lawfulness of the dismissal is based, cannot digress in the employer’s sentence of organizational choices that otherwise he would not have taken