Court of Cassation (sentence no. 17752/2010): clarification about the accident in itinere
The Court of Cassation hasn’t recognized that an accident so called “in itinere” occurred (and has denied the relevant restore) to a worker who used to go to…
The Court of Cassation hasn’t recognized that an accident so called “in itinere” occurred (and has denied the relevant restore) to a worker who used to go to…
The Supreme Court, with the order no. 17720/2010, stated that the minutes of the social security institutions’ officials are to be considered as evidence of the circumstances…
The Court of Cassation stated that the employer is entitled to refuse to hire a disabled worker whether if the latter has an employment status different from the…
The Court of Cassation, with sentence n. 12596/2010, pointed out that in case of administrative sanctions imposed by the Inspective Labour Department (so called “Ispettorato del Lavoro”) for…
The Court of Cassation, with sentence no. 11250/2010, pointed out that the posting of the disciplinary code has to be considered a basic requirement only for the lawfulness…
The Court of Cassation, IV Penal Section, confirmed the criminal liability of the Employer that had not assessed the risks about the use of a flat that he…
The Court of Cassation confirmed and specified the principles outlined by case-law on injuries so called “in itinere”. In particular, the worker that has an accident during the…
The labour section of the Court of Cassation stated that the company communication concerning the reduction of the work activity is not enough to trigger temporary lay off…
The Court of Cassation changed its prevailing stance on the compensation effect of the present missed challenge of dismissal, determining that if the judge can no longer ascertain…
The Court of Cassation stated that in the case of fixed term hiring for the replacement of a worker absent having the right to hold his job (Law…