Categorie: Insights, Pubblicazioni


12 Lug 2016

Whistleblowing: transparency in the labour market for anti–corruption sistem (Invest in Lombardy Blog, 13 luglio 2016 – Vittorio De Luca, Claudia Cerbone)

Sometimes Italy is connoted by a low level of transparency,  which indicates a high level of corruption; on a scale of 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean), according to Corruption Perceptions Index 2015 by Transparency International, Italy ranks #61 after Romania (#58), Oman (#60) and in the same position as Lesotho, Senegal and Montenegro. This index may affect the foreign perception of Italy being a trustable country, and a safe place to run business with a direct negative effect on foreign investments. How to change this reputation?

One of the main challenges to thwart corruption is to be able to bring out the crime itself: hence the need to provide a framework that allows people to report the crimes.

So far, the existing Italian whistleblowing law provision – Article 54-bis of the Legislative Decree no. 165/2001 applied to the public employees – is about to be completed by a new law which is being debated and about to be approved by the Parliament. Bill proposal no. 2208, when approved shall extend to all employees (private and public sector) the whistleblowing rules (amending Article. 6 of Legislative Decree no. 231/2001) and provide an effective and efficient legal guardianship to any employee who intends to denounce a misconduct that may entail a crime. According to the new law, employees having “blown the whistle” (s.c. whistleblowers) will have to be treated fairly and their possible dismissal will be considered as unfair. The key factors of the Bill proposal no. 2208 are the following:

  • employees who in good faith make public disclosure of corruption or wrongdoing to the company competent authorities or to the    (ANAC), of which he became aware by reason of the employment relationship, can not be penalized, down-graded, fired, transferred or submitted to further punitive measures;
  • good faith is excluded if the whistleblower acts with fraud or gross negligence, but it is not required that the employee is certain   about the crimes, being needed that he believes highly probable the occurrence of criminal acts;
  •  it is forbidden to disclose the whistleblower identity;
  • the whistleblower is no longer protected if he is condemned in a criminal Court for slander or defamation.

The protection granted to whistleblowers makes a relevant contribution to the implementation of a labour market based on an anti-corruption system, with a substantial improve in employment: indeed foreign investors will have one additional reason to consider investments in Italy.

Furthermore, it is worth noting that, in the last few months, the Italian lawmaker extended also the anti-money laundering provisions, providing for additional cases in which professionals are required to report, to the competent authorities, cases of money laundering and racketeering. The Italian market, therefore, is rising again following the rules of publicity, transparency, democratic participation and to disclose the decision-making processes of any company doing business in Italy.

The whistleblowing Bill proposal is a new brick in the deep reform the present Italian Government is implementing in Italy and which allowed this country to improve by 20 positions since 2014, in the World Bank Doing Business ranking.

Fonte:

Invest in Lombardy Blog

Iscriviti alla newsletter

Contattaci

Hai bisogno di informazioni? Scrivici e il nostro team di esperti ti risponderà il prima possibile.

Compila il form

Altre news e insights

12 Ott 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – Conferenza IBA 2026

In occasione della IBA Annual Conference 2026 di Copenhagen, il nostro Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca ha moderato, insieme ad Anne Morel (BSP, Lussemburgo), una sessione dedicata a…

1 Ott 2026

E-mail aziendale e controlli difensivi: quando GDPR e diritto del lavoro non coincidono 

La vicenda Piaggio mostra con particolare evidenza come, a fronte dei medesimi fatti, possano convivere valutazioni profondamente diverse a seconda della prospettiva adottata. Il Tribunale di Pisa, con…

1 Ott 2026

NASpI e reintegra: l’opzione del lavoratore fa perdere l’indennità 

Massima  La Corte di Cassazione, con la recente n. 24981 del 3 settembre 2026, ha statuito che, ove il licenziamento sia annullato con ordine di reintegrazione ai sensi…

1 Ott 2026

Lo sai che… una testimonianza resa in giudizio può avere rilevanza disciplinare e, nei casi più gravi, giustificare il licenziamento? 

La Corte di Cassazione, Sezione Lavoro, con l’ordinanza n. 25687 del 22 settembre 2026, ha affrontato il tema della rilevanza disciplinare delle dichiarazioni rese dal lavoratore nell’ambito di…

29 Set 2026

Shadow AI in azienda: come governare rischi, dati e sicurezza (Agenda digitale, 29 settembre 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Martina De Angeli)

La diffusione di strumenti di intelligenza artificiale utilizzati senza autorizzazione aziendale espone le imprese a rischi che riguardano dati personali, informazioni riservate, know-how e cybersecurity. Per governare la…

24 Set 2026

Il concetto di “territorio” nell’ambito del patto di non concorrenza (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 settembre 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandro Ferrari)

Le problematiche interpretative alla luce della più recente giurisprudenza in materia di nullità del patto di non concorrenza per indeterminatezza del limite territoriale Con ordinanza del 2 aprile…