DLP Insights

Interdepartmental dismissals (Court of Cassation, Judgement no. 9991 of 29 April 2009)

06 Jul 2009

The Court of Cassation has clarified that the dismissal of an employee in a department other than that subject to company reorganisation is fair. The Court in fact specified that the demarcation of boundaries for personnel subject to mobility risk can be limited to the employees of a particular area only if this meet objective company requirements, related to the corporate dismissal project. The reason that define the aforesaid boundary has to be proved by the employer. As a consequence, it is not fair the dismissal of employees based only on the fact that they work in the business department eliminated or reduced, not considering the possession of professional skills and capabilities equal to that of employees belonging to other departments.

Italian Court of Cassation: second dismissal lawful pending judgment on the first

30 Jan 2024

In its very recent judgment no. 2274 of 23 January 2024, the Italian Court of Cassation ruled that it is lawful for an employer to give notice of a second dismissal pending a judgment concerning a previous dismissal based on different grounds. However, the second dismissal has no effect if the first dismissal is declared ....

Liability under Italian Legislative Decree no. 231/2001: obtaining minimal advantage does not exempt the employer

29 Dec 2023

With judgment no. 39129 of 26 September 2023, the Italian Court of Cassation, Third Criminal Division addressed the issue of corporate administrative liability under Italian Legislative Decree no. 231/2001, stating that “corporate administrative liability is not excluded in the light of the minimal advantage or the insignificance of the interest pursued.” The facts of the ....

Dismissal to reduce costs: what does the employer need to prove?

29 Dec 2023

With Order no. 31660 of 14 November 2023, the Italian Court of Cassation ruled that, when dismissal for justified objective reason (giustificato motivo oggettivo, ‘GMO’) is to reduce costs, the burden is on the employer to indicate the reasons why the particular worker has been chosen. The facts of the case The employee appealed the ....

Italian Court of Cassation: assessment of CCNL job descriptions essential for repêchage (obligation to relocate)

28 Nov 2023

By Order of 13 November 2023, no. 31561, the Italian Court of Cassation ruled that, to fully comply with the repêchage obligation (obligation to relocate), it is necessary to assess whether hires made following the termination for justified objective reasons are of the same level of classification as the dismissed employee. The facts of the ....