Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: cessione ramo d'azienda, relazioni industriali


31 Mar 2022

Business transfer: RSA does not automatically lapse (Newsletter Norme & Tributi n. 158 Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica – Vittorio De Luca, Elena Cannone)

In a judgement of 21 December 2021, the Court of Milan held that, unless specifically stated otherwise in applicable law, a business transfer does not affect the continuity of employment and the maintenance of the rights and obligations arising from it, nor does it prevent the continuity of internal union offices and responsibilities based on pre-existing representation relationships [RSA], especially when the transfer concerns all the workers constituting the “electoral base” of the union representative, who has also been transferred to the transferee company. In the case at hand, a service company, having acquired 4 business units, informed the trade unions that (i) it would apply to the transferred employees its own NCBA in place of the one previously applied and, as a result, (ii) the RSAs of those units were “automatically and immediately terminated”. According to the First-Instance Court, this ‘automatic and immediate revocation’ would deprive the transferred employees of their trade union representation in the sensitive context of a business transfer, in addition to causing a marked imbalance between the two sides of trade union relations, and it is not consistent with the aims of Art. 6 of Directive 2001/23/EC.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…