Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: GDPR


23 Jun 2022

Data Protection Authority: entrusting processing to third parties requires the adoption of appropriate measures (Norme e Tributi Plus Diritto of Il Sole 24 Ore, 23 June 2022 – Enrico De Luca, Martina De Angeli)

The Italian Data Protection Authority (“Garante”), in its 28 April 2022 injunction of 28 April 2022, imposed on a company in charge of managing the municipal waste collection service for the Municipality of Taranto (the “Municipality”), a € 200,000 fine for having entrusted processing personal data to a sub-processor without having requested and obtained specific or general written authorisation from the Municipality – the data controller.
Following widespread waste abandonment within the area under its responsibility, the municipality entrusted an owned company the task to verify and contest any offences arising from the violation of the municipal regulations on waste disposal. The municipality and the company agreed on installing video surveillance systems at sites considered particularly sensitive, as they were the places where the illegal dumping of waste occurred more frequently.
From a report received by the Data Protection Authority, it emerged that the company disseminated, through the publication on its Facebook profile of videos and images, collected through the above video surveillance systems, from which the offending citizens were or could be identified.

Following the report received, the Authority opened a preliminary investigation which revealed that the company started processing in March 2012 under a municipal ordinance without the relationship regulated under the previous legislation.
Since November 2020, it had used a supplier (designated as data controller) for the collection of video surveillance images without the “prior specific or general written authorisation of the data controller (ed. the Municipality)” as required by art. 28 of the GDPR. In January 2022, the Municipality and the company signed an “agreement for the protection of personal data and appointment as an external data controller” under art. 28 of the GDPR. In that agreement, the Municipality specified that “upon its prior written authorisation, the company may make Municipality-owned personal data available to third parties (as sub-processors), to entrust them with part of the processing activities.”

Continue reading the full version published in Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto of Il Sole 24 Ore

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…