Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: Decreto trasparenza, digital transformation, Privacy


7 Aug 2023

Italian Transparency Decree obligations continue to apply to fully automated systems (Norme e Tributi Plus Lavoro of Il Sole 24 Ore, 7 August 2023 – Vittorio De Luca, Alessandra Zilla, Martina De Angeli)

Workers must be informed of the use of fully automated decision-making or monitoring systems. In particular they must be informed of the aspects of the relationship involved, the purposes and purposes of the systems, and how they operate.

The emergence of technologies using artificial intelligence systems and their increasing use has ushered in a new round of debate on the key ethical, social and legal issues surrounding the use of such technologies and their consequences.
At EU level, the need has emerged to ensure that new technologies develop while respecting the fundamental rights and dignity of individuals, to achieve goals that do not conflict with the interests of the community. To this end, the European Commission put forward a Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence launched in Brussels on 21 April 2021 and approved on 14 June 2023 (Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act).
The work environment is not immune to such changes, if we think, for example, of the systems used for logistics management in warehouses as well as the platforms employed by riders.

The Artificial Intelligence Act and the Transparency Directive.

The AI Act classifies as ‘high-risk systems’ those used ‘in employment, workers management and access to self-employment, [intended to be used] for recruitment and selection of natural persons […] for making decisions on promotion and termination […] for task allocation, and for monitoring and evaluating performance […] of persons in such relationships’.  This classification stems from the fact that ‘those systems may appreciably impact future career prospects and livelihoods of these persons’.

In relation to the rapid development in the work environment of automated systems and the associated risks, the European Union has also stressed the importance of workers being fully and promptly informed of the fundamental terms and conditions of their employment. To this end, the national legislature implemented Directive (EU) 2019/1152 on transparent and predictable working conditions. This has resulted in employers being required to provide workers and employment organisations with information regarding the use of automated decision-making or monitoring systems (Article 1-bis of Italian Legislative Decree No. 152/1997, introduced by the Transparency Decree, Italian Legislative Decree No. 104/2022). The purpose, as outlined in the introduction and Article 1 of the EU Directive, is to improve working conditions by promoting more transparent and predictable employment, while ensuring labour market adaptability to new technologies. Specific disclosure is required when the manner in which workers’ services are performed is organised through the use of automated decision-making and/or monitoring systems, which provide relevant information regarding the recruitment, assignment, management or termination of employment, assignment of tasks or duties, and supervision, evaluation, performance, and fulfilment of workers’ contractual obligations.

The full version can be accessed at Norme e Tributi Plus Lavoro of Il Sole 24 Ore.  

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…