Categories: Insights, Publications · News

Tag: RSU


19 Mar 2020

Trade Union Meeting can be called even by a single member of the RSU (Newsletter Norme & Tributi n. 140 Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica – Vittorio De Luca, Elena Cannone)

The Court of Cassation, with ruling no. 2862 filed on 6/2/2020, declared that a single member of the Rappresentanza Sindacale Unitaria (RSU) calling the union meeting is a right by law. According to this court, the 2014 National Multi-Industry Agreement (Representation Consolidating Act) sanctions this right as inviolable. This right is a prerogative to assign not only to the RSU considered collectively, but also to each of its members. However, the Court of Cassation lays down one condition necessary for the right to be recognised as fully legal. Specifically, the RSU member requesting that the meeting be called must be a member “elected from the lists of a union that, in the company of reference, has powers of representation pursuant to Art. 19 of Law 300/1970, consequent to Constitutional Court ruling no. 231 of 2013”. In this way overturning what the judge of first instance and the local Court of Appeals had established, the Court of Cassation upheld the appeal of the union organisation FIOM CGIL. The Court of Cassation declared the conduct of the company that had not granted one hour of paid union meeting as anti-union, pursuant to Art. 28 of the Workers’ Statute, because it had been called by only the RSU members elected from the lists of the petitioner union.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…