Categories: Insights, Publications


29 May 2018

Right to criticize and dismissal: when the worker is justified (Il Quotidiano del Lavoro de Il Sole 24 Ore, 30 May 2018 – Alberto De Luca, Gabriele Scafati)

With judgment No. 11645/18, the Court of Cassation made clear once again its opinion on the relation between the right of criticism, protected under the Constitution, and the civil duty of loyalty and honesty in the relationship between employees and employers. In the case in question, an employee of a famous telephony company had been fired after having sent several emails to her superiors, complaining about her work position, using wording deemed offensive and libellous by the employer. Even though the legitimacy of the decision before the Court of Cassation did not end favourably for the petitioning employer, the judgment offered the opportunity to summarize the interpretation of jurisprudence in the matter of the right to criticism of the employer and the related boundary of insubordination. In particular, the case before the courts that represent the founding stone on the matter in question (Civil Court of Cassation, Labour Law, No. 1173/1986), in order to establish in practical terms within which limits the right to criticism against the employer is legitimate and as such not subjected to disciplinary dismissal, it is necessary first to verify if it meets the following requirements: if the conduct in question has been effectively damaging to the corporate reputation and to that of its managers; if the allegations that are deemed libellous have been expressed in defence of legally relevant interests and if the facts subject matter of the statement deemed libellous were real.

    Read here the original version published on Il Quotidiano del Lavoro.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…