Categories: Insights, Case Law


26 Jun 2017

Company know-how prevails over the employee’s right of defence

The Court of Cassation, with judgement No. 12804 dated 22 May 2017, stated that a disciplinary measure can be applied to any employee who photocopies material representing company know-how, even if such activity is carried out to protect the employee’s right in a legal proceeding. In the specific case, the employee, first disciplined and then dismissed, appealed to the Court of Cassation stating that (i) the photocopying of the company material was necessary for his defence since he had been demoted for a long time (ii) the documentation was not confidential, and, in any case (iii) the protection of rights shall prevail over the duty of confidentiality. According to the Court of Cassation, this reason cannot be deemed well founded since, “even from the testimony performed”, it appeared that the photocopying did not concern “a mere proprietary material of the company”, but “instructions that contained specific information regarding the type of materials, procedures and the tools used (…) thus actual company know-how whose confidentiality is strengthened by the need not to divulge to third parties (including those who may be competitors) knowledge that has a production importance“. Therefore, according to the Court, what is emphasized is not “a generic duty not to disclose corporate documents, but a specific obligation to keep confidential documents that concern important and significant aspects of the employer’s production organization.” Documents that, among other things, the employee, according to the Court, could have requested to obtain through the court under Article. 210 of the code of civil procedures.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…