Categories: Insights, Case Law


1 May 2017

Court of Cassation: dismissal of working mothers is void

The Court of Cassation, with judgement No. 475, filed on 11 January 2017, intervened in the matter of dismissal of working mothers, stating once again that dismissal ordered to a working mother at the beginning of the pregnancy until her child is one year old is void and ineffective. In the specific case, the Court corrected the decision of the judges ruling on the merits, which, by considering unlawful the dismissal, ordered the employer company to re-hire the worker, or failing to do so, to reimburse her damages in the amount of five monthly salaries equal to the last wage paid. On the matter, according to the Court of Cassation, the Court having jurisdiction had erroneously applied art. 8 of Law No. 604 of 1966, since the “the regulatory measures as per Legislative Decree No. 151 of 2001 do not refer at all to Law No. 604 of 1966 and Law No. 300 of 1970; thus, dismissal is void pursuant to art. 54 of Legislative Decree No. 151 of 2001 and such rule is fully unrelated to the concept of just cause and justified reason”. Consequently, in the case in hand, the relationship must be deemed as never interrupted and the worker has the right to wages since the day of dismissal up to the actual re-admission into service. In other words, during the protected period, employment is ensured.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…