DLP Insights

Court of Vicenza: staff leasing with wide reason

01 Apr 2011

Court of Vicenza, with sentence of February 17, 2011, has diverged from the case-law guideline which has consolidated in the last two years regarding necessary conditions for the stipulation of a fixed-term staff leasing contract and has stated that technical, organizational, productive or substitutive reasons set forth by law have not to be pointed in detailed in the aforementioned contract because in the European law restrictions for using staff leasing contract are forbidden. The Court shall not examine if the reason of the contract has pointed in a generic or in a specific way, but only the existence of technical, organizational, productive or substitutive reasons, the fulfillment of formal requirements of the contract and limitations set in the national collective agreement. Therefore, the nullity of the contract may be due to the lack of the written form or of the reason only.

Italian Court of Cassation: second dismissal lawful pending judgment on the first

30 Jan 2024

In its very recent judgment no. 2274 of 23 January 2024, the Italian Court of Cassation ruled that it is lawful for an employer to give notice of a second dismissal pending a judgment concerning a previous dismissal based on different grounds. However, the second dismissal has no effect if the first dismissal is declared ....

Liability under Italian Legislative Decree no. 231/2001: obtaining minimal advantage does not exempt the employer

29 Dec 2023

With judgment no. 39129 of 26 September 2023, the Italian Court of Cassation, Third Criminal Division addressed the issue of corporate administrative liability under Italian Legislative Decree no. 231/2001, stating that “corporate administrative liability is not excluded in the light of the minimal advantage or the insignificance of the interest pursued.” The facts of the ....

Dismissal to reduce costs: what does the employer need to prove?

29 Dec 2023

With Order no. 31660 of 14 November 2023, the Italian Court of Cassation ruled that, when dismissal for justified objective reason (giustificato motivo oggettivo, ‘GMO’) is to reduce costs, the burden is on the employer to indicate the reasons why the particular worker has been chosen. The facts of the case The employee appealed the ....

Italian Court of Cassation: assessment of CCNL job descriptions essential for repêchage (obligation to relocate)

28 Nov 2023

By Order of 13 November 2023, no. 31561, the Italian Court of Cassation ruled that, to fully comply with the repêchage obligation (obligation to relocate), it is necessary to assess whether hires made following the termination for justified objective reasons are of the same level of classification as the dismissed employee. The facts of the ....