Categories: Insights, Case Law


29 Jan 2017

Dismissal on exceeding the maximum number of sickness absence days

The Court of Cassation, with judgment No. 284 dated 10 January 2017, intervened on the subject of dismissal on exceeding the maximum number of sickness absence days by primarily stating that the calculation must not consider the afternoons during which the worker is subjected to specific medical treatment, when the worker, on a part time basis, has duly performed his/her activities in the morning. In addition, the Court stated – thus following an almost consolidated trend – that this type of dismissal is equivalent to a dismissal for justified objective grounds and not to a disciplinary dismissal. Therefore, it does not need a detailed description of all the elements related to the reasons underlying it (listing of each day of absence, since the total number of absences in a given time period is sufficient). All this without prejudice to the burden by the employer to prove before the Court the facts underlying the dismissal measure. In the same judgment, the Court of Cassation also noted that sending to the employer an illness certificate that covers the workdays during the period when the employee is on holiday leads to a change in the title of absence with their consequent relevance for the calculation of the number of sickness absence days.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…