Categories: Insights, Legislation


1 Jan 2017

Gangmastering is now a predicate offence entailing the administrative liability of entities

With the entry into force of Law no. 199/2016 on 4 November 2016, the predicate offences entailing the administrative liability of entities set forth by Legislative Decree no. 231/2001 (hereinafter the “Decree”) now include illegal intermediation and exploitation of labour (known as the “gangmastering”). More specifically, the measures set forth by section 25 quinquies of the Decree against this offence include (i) the application of a fine ranging from 400 to 1.000 quotas (where one quota is worth a minimum of 258 Euro to a maximum of 1,549 Euro); (ii) in the case of a sentence, a disqualification penalty (i.e. debarment, suspension or revocation of permits, licenses or concessions; prohibition of entering into negotiations and contracts with the public administration; exclusion from benefits, loans, grants or subsidies and revocation of those already granted; prohibition to advertise goods or services) for a period of no less than 1 year. However, if the entity or any local unit thereof is used for the sole purpose of making it possible to commit or facilitate this crime, the penalty applied is the definitive disqualification from carrying out its business activities. This legislative development will make it necessary to update existing organisational models, which should be updated to take the new predicate offence into account.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…