Categories: Insights


25 May 2010

LABOUR ATTACHMENT: EXAMINATION OF THE AMENDMENTS

Here are some of the main labour law amendments of the so called "Work related act" (presented by the chairman Maurizio Castro, PDL party) that may be examined by the Labour Commission of the Senate:
 
     as per the compulsoriness of the arbitration, an employee of the private sector will be able to decide, before signing the employment contract, to apply to the arbitration clause with reference to every dispute that could arise during the employment relationship. Such clauses may be certificated by the so called “Authentication Commissions”. Considering that, the amendment approved by the Chamber of Deputies which, on the contrary, allows to employees to settle on, for every dispute, to apply to the arbitrator or to the judge would be made useless;
 
     as legal terms of challenge, the dismissal may be challenged by the employee within 270 days (instead of 180) starting from the deposit of the claim at the office of the court’s clerk or from the communication of the required attempt of settle or arbitration;
 
     in case of oral dismissal, the aforesaid dismissal may be challenged by the employee within 90 days (instead of 60). If the employer did not justify the measure, the legal term to impugn starts by the date which the dismissal causes had to be communicated within;
 
    as per the so called “amnesty” regarding the ongoing and coordinated collaborations, the employee may have offered to the employer the drawing up of a subordinate employment contract, also with a fixed term, within the 30th September 2008, and, afterwards the approval of the Labour attachment, may offer to the collaborator an open-ended employment contract “with equivalent duties to those one assessed”, as mentioned in the aforesaid law.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…