Categories: Insights


7 Oct 2009

Work and privacy: technology and companies power control

Over six and a half million of employees use internet during working hours for non-working purposes. Every month, each employee sets to navigation around 38 hours which is equal to, more or less, a week of work.
 
Among companies, there are some which do not set limits to surf the internet for their employees during working hours, some which recommend to connect only at lunch time or before the beginning of the turn, some which put up filters to block access to web sites that have nothing to deal with work.
 
However, companies that intend to limit and prevent any abuse have to deal with the guarantees contained in the Statute of Workers and in the Privacy Code.
 
Art. 4 of the Statute, in fact, does not allow the installation of “audiovisual equipment or other equipment” that allow remote control of employees, while the art. 8 and the Privacy Code safeguard the right of the employee not to reveal political opinions, religious affiliations or trade union opinions.
 
Use of the e-mail is even more protected than internet browsing: in principle, in fact, the contents of email messages, even if the exchange of e-mail is via personal business address, have remain secret unless should occur irregular usage of e-mail.
 
In this case, control is possible but should never constitute remote control of the work performance. Furthermore, the contents of the correspondence itself have to be not accessible.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…