Categories: Insights, Practice

Tag: Ispettorato Nazionale del Lavoro


28 Aug 2018

Failure to hire disabled people or individuals falling under protected categories is an immediate breach of the law with permanent effects

The National Labour Inspectorate (INL), with  its Note No. 6316 dated 18 July 2018 provided its opinion regarding the legal nature of the offence related to failure to hire disabled individuals or individuals belonging to the protected categories as per art. 15, paragraph 4, of the law No. 68/1999. According to INL the aforementioned offence shall be deemed immediate and with permanent effects. Immediate due to the fact that the omission occurs when the term established by law expires and the party bearing the legal responsibility to perform the hiring by the 60th day from the date in which the obligation occurs fails to do so. Permanent due to the extended effect of the offence over time until the breach is corrected. Qualifying an offence as immediate triggers a number of repercussions in terms of applicable regulation, in the case of sequence of laws over time. Regarding the offences occurred when the old regulation was in force – whose effects continue to apply even after the new penalty provision established by article 5, paragraph 1, letter b) of Law Decree No. 185/2016entered into force on 8 October 2016 – the applicable penalty will be the one in force at the time in which the offence occurred, according to the “tempus regit actum” principle. Even with reference to the terms of the statute of limitations it will be necessary to refer to the time when the offence actually occurred.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…