Categories: Insights, Practice


26 Feb 2017

Massive, prolonged and indiscriminate monitoring on computer tools provided to employees are forbidden

With measure no. 547 dated 22 December 2016 and published in the newsletter of 17 February 2017, the Privacy Authority for the protection of personal data reaffirmed that an employer cannot access indiscriminately emails or personal data contained in the devices provided to employees. According to the Privacy Authority, the employer, in spite of having the right to check the proper performance of the service and the correct use of the work tools by the employee, must in any case safeguard personal freedom and dignity, complying with legal regulations. The labour regulations on remote monitoring (in this case under article 4 of the Worker’s Statute in its “new formulation” after the Jobs Act), moreover establishes that it is unlawful to carry out activities suitable to achieve, even indirectly, a massive, prolonged and indiscriminate monitoring of the employee’s performance. And in any case, the Privacy Authority reaffirms that employees must always be informed clearly and in a detailed manner about the methods of use of the tools in question and about any monitoring activities. This is because the absence of an explicit policy in this regard may lead to a legitimate expectation by the employee (or a third party) of the confidentiality of certain forms of communication.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…