Categories: Insights, Practice


26 Feb 2018

Remote control of workers: additional operating provisions from the Labour Inspectorate

In Circular Letter no. 5 of 19 February 2018, the National Labour Inspectorate provided further operating provisions on the “new” Article 4, Workers’ Statute. In particular, the Inspectorate specified that, due to actual reasons of control, a video surveillance system may also monitor the workers without any limitations as to the camera angle, the blacking out of the face of the operator or the specific indication of the position of the cameras and their exact number. This is so because oftentimes the conditions of places and the positions of merchandise or production plants is subject to continuous changes in the course of time. Only for systems that start operating when workers are present, observance of the principles of proportionality, fairness and not excess set out in the Privacy Code should also be verified. According to the Labour Inspectorate, the use of video surveillance systems based on IP technology can also be allowed; remote access to these in real time must be authorized only in exceptional cases, while access to recorded images shall be traced in order to allow storage of “log-ins” for a period of at least six months. Regarding the collection and processing of biometric data, the Labour Inspectorate has accepted the indications of the Italian Data Protection Authority, setting out that these devices are legitimate only if they are considered indispensable tools to perform the work as they aim at limiting access to “sensitive” areas or allowing use of hazardous machinery only by qualified personnel. The new provisions of the Labour Inspectorate, even if they remove many doubts, basically further prove that the application of the matter at hand is uncertain and that it is necessary to make personalized inquiries into each specific case.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…