Categories: Insights, Practice


29 May 2017

The new rules governing merit-based indemnity

Effective 1 April 2017, the new method for the calculation of the merit-based indemnity for sales agents established by article 11 of the Collective bargaining agreement for the industrial sector (Aec Industria) signed by the social partners on 30 July 2014. The new rules, which follow closely the method adopted by the German Commercial Code, introduce a rather complex system based on the calculation of the “difference between the initial commissions and the final ones“. Essentially, a comparison is made between the volume of commission income and any other remuneration received by the agent on the first and the last portion of the relationship. In addition, two new criteria have been introduced to define the calculation: (i) the assessment period(periodo di prognosi) subsequent to the termination of the relationship, that is the expected years for which the contracting company will benefit from the work of the agent and (ii) the expected migration rateof clients, that is the percentage of annual turnover reduction and/or loss of clients regardless of the activities of the agent. If the merit-based indemnity so calculated exceeds the amount established by art. 1751 of the Civil Code, it shall be equal to that amount. If, instead, it is lower than the statutory amount, only the portion exceeding the value of the Firr (Retirement Bonus Provision) and the provision for supplementary customer allowances (indennità suppletiva di clientela) shall be paid. As anticipated, this calculation system applies only effective from 1 April 2017: this means that for agency agreements already in place at the time of entry into force of the Aec, in order to calculate the merit-based indemnity it will be necessary to apply two different calculations, using respectively the old and the new calculation criteria.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…