Categories: Insights, Publications


2 Dec 2018

A dismissal due to elapsing of the grace period must be prompt (Il Quotidiano del Lavoro de Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 December 2018 – Alberto De Luca, Luciano Vella)

Dismissal ordered due to elapsing of the grace period must be ordered without delay. This was the ruling of the Court of Cassation with judgement no. 29402 dated 15 November 2018.
The legal proceedings originated from the legal action brought forth after a dismissal ordered for elapsing of the sick leave grace period established by the collective agreement, which was not ordered immediately after the event, but after four months.
According to the Judge of first instance, the dismissal was lawful, given the uniqueness of the type of dismissal, since it did not have a disciplinary nature. The Court of Appeals of Lecce, however, was of a different opinion, when consulted during the appeal, and it overturned the corporate provision since it accepted the objection of lateness raised by the petitioner. In fact, the local Court pointed out that the employer’s delay led the employee to legitimately believe that the employment relationship would continue, even after a period since the sick leave.
Against the appeal’s ruling, the Company then filed its case to the Court of Cassation, claiming the incorrect application of the law by the judges of the Court of Appeals.
Queried on the matter, the Court of Cassation shared the interpretation of the Court of Appeals, confirming that dismissal due to elapsing of the grace period must be adopted immediately after the event, since a delay, under the perspective of conclusive facts, could cause a legitimate belief of “stabilisation of the employment relationship” even after the grace period, thus making any dismissal unlawful.
In particular, regarding the resolution of the proceedings, the Court of Cassation made reference to ruling no. 194/2010, issued by the same local Court, which stated that the timely notification criterion would apply also in the case of the grace period, a criterion that in any case “would have to be adopted not only strictly related to a chronological consideration, but to the entire context of the circumstances needed to assess the conduct of the company with regard to its will towards the termination”.
The ruling under review is aligned to a consolidated legal viewpoint on legitimacy that declared unlawful in multiple occasions any dismissal ordered after a period of time from the elapsing of the sick leave grace period, pointing out that the passing of considerable time gives rise to the fact that the will of the employer is to dismiss (Court of Cassation Labour Division no. 25535/2018)

 

Read here the full version of the article here.

 

 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…