Are Influencers commercial agents? (Mag Life Style, 1 August 2024 – Vittorio De Luca)
Following the recent cases that marked a significant moment in the evolution of influencers’ activity, highlighting how crucially important authenticity is between influencers, brands and users, the recent intervention of the Court of Rome is of particular interest. In its judgment no. 2615 of 4 March 2024, the Court expressed its opinion on the classification of the collaboration relationship between influencer and client Company, considered analogous to the contractual regime of the agency relationship under Article 1742 and following, Italian Civil Code.
In the case considered, the Court of Rome held that the professional “was actually carrying out sales promotion activities where the remuneration was determined by the orders directly procured and successfully completed by the collaborator”, and was able to grant discounts to follower users.
This is notwithstanding the claimant Company’s arguments that the conditions necessary to classify the influencers as Commercial Agents were missing on the basis of the following factors: the existence of a permanent professional services contract under which the services were provided, the absence of a permanent on-going appointment for the promotion and conclusion on behalf of the Company of sales contracts in a specific area, and the absence of a specified scope of work, which is typical of the contract referred to in Article 1742 of the Italian Civil Code.
Continue reading the full version published on Mag Life Style.
On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…
With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…
Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…
“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…
With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…
The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…