Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: DURC, Welfare


30 Jun 2022

Contractual welfare and social security contribution obligation compliance document (DURC) (Modulo24 Contenzioso del Lavoro (Form24 Labour Litigation) of Il Sole 24 Ore, 30 June 2022 – Vittorio De Luca, Marco Giangrande)

Examination of the relationship between contractual and corporate welfare (where works and services are not subject to contributions and taxation) and the social security contribution obligation compliance document (DURC) which is indispensable for accessing the regulatory and contributory benefits provided for by the labour and social legislation

Contractual welfare is the worker protection and welfare system, supplementary to that provided by the state, which originates from collective bargaining at different levels: national, local, or corporate.

Traditionally, contractual welfare was distinguished from employer or corporate welfare, considered as a set of services and benefits provided to workers on the employer’s unilateral and voluntary initiative, without any negotiation or agreement with workers’ trade union.

Law no.  208 of 28 December 2015, (Stability Law for 2016) overcame the identification of corporate welfare with the features of unilaterality and voluntariness, technically and culturally modifying the previous approach. The previous regulations excluded from employee income welfare works and services only if they were provided on the employer’s voluntary and unilateral initiative.

It was decided that the “use of works and services recognised by the employer voluntarily or under contractual provisions or company regulations  does not contribute to the formation of employment income.”

If in the previous wording of Art. 51 of the TUIR (Consolidated Income Tax Law) (Presidential Decree no. 917/1986) the provision application was limited to disbursements made “voluntarily” by the employer (therefore tax authorities and tax case law excluded collective bargaining disbursements), the 2016 Stability Law overturned this previous approach, introducing company bargaining as the privileged tool used to implement welfare policies.

However, there is no legal definition of contractual or corporate welfare, and the doctrine describes it as the set of benefits and services provided by the company to its employees to improve their private and working life. These include family support, study, parenting, health protection, time-related and commercial benefits.

Contribution exemption and tax provisions

Law no. 208 of 28 December 2015 (Stability Law for 2016) introduced important changes on the detaxation of bonuses for objectives deriving from local or corporate collective agreements, and on goods and services (benefits) provided by employers to employees, i.e., disbursements comprising contractual and corporate welfare, which is exempt from contributions and taxes.

Art. 51, paragraph 2, letter f), of the TUIR establishes that the following do not contribute to forming employment income: “the use of works and services recognised by the employer voluntarily or under contractual provisions or company agreements or regulations, offered to employees or categories of employees and family members specified in Article 12, for the purposes referred to in paragraph 1, of Article 100.”

Art. 1, paragraph 162, of Law no. 232/2016, specified that the provisions of Article 51, paragraph 2, letter f) of the TUIR must be interpreted in the sense that they apply to works and services recognised by the employer, in the private or public sector, under a national collective labour agreement, multi-industry or local collective agreements.

Social security contribution obligation compliance document (DURC)

The Social security contribution obligation compliance document (DURC) certifies compliance with company payments of social security, welfare contributions, and insurance premiums.

Based on a single electronic request, the authorised party can simultaneously verify the compliance of an economic operator with contribution obligations to INPS, INAIL, and the Construction Industry Fund (only for companies belonging to the construction sector or applying the relevant National Collective Labour Agreement).

Originally created as a unified certification for contribution and insurance payment compliance by construction companies contracted for public works, the DURC’s scope of application was gradually broadened, until reaching the current situation where the DURC is compulsory regardless of contribution classification.

There are two separate documents for company contribution payment compliance: the “Online DURC”, used by external parties to verify the economic operator’s contribution compliance (Ministerial Decree 30 January 2015; INPS Circular no. 126/2015; INPS messages no. 4580/2015), and the “Internal DURC”, which is indispensable to access the regulatory and contributory benefits under labour and social legislation.

Contribution benefits

Under Art. 1, paragraph 1175, Law no. 296/2006, access to the regulatory and contributory benefits under labour and social legislation is subject to the possession of the DURC by employers.

Art. 1, paragraph 1175, Law no. 296/2006 states that from 1 July 2007, the regulatory and contributory benefits under labour and social legislation are subject to the possession of the DURC by employers, “ without prejudice to other legal obligations and compliance with national, regional, local or company collective agreements, stipulated by the employers’ and employees’ trade unions that are comparatively more representative at a national level.”

Continue reading the full version published in Modulo24 Contenzioso Lavoro (Form24 Labour Litigation of Il Sole 24 ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…