Categories: Insights, Do you know that

Tag: contrattazione collettiva


13 Aug 2025

DID YOU KNOW THAT… collective bargaining agreements may legitimately allow work to be performed even on midweek public holidays?

With Order No. 42802 of December 20, 2023, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – clarified that the employee’s right to abstain from work on midweek holidays, although recognized under Italian law, is neither absolute nor non-negotiable, and can validly be regulated by collective bargaining agreements.

In the case at hand, some employees engaged in an essential public service claimed the right to abstain from work on civil and religious midweek holidays, arguing that such a right could only be waived through an express individual agreement. The Court of Appeal, upholding the ruling of the lower court, agreed with this interpretation, stating that an obligation to work on holidays could arise only from individual pacts, not collective bargaining.

However, the Supreme Court overturned this decision, considering the reasoning of the lower courts to be flawed. According to the Court, the right to rest on midweek holidays is compatible with an organization of work based on rotating shifts covering the entire week, provided such arrangements are set forth in collective agreements and accepted by the employee, even implicitly (i.e. “facta concludentia”).

In particular, the Court emphasized that while the right to rest on such days is granted by law (Law No. 260/1949), it is a “disposable” right and may be modified through valid collective bargaining agreements referenced in the individual contract or consistently applied over time. In these cases, the employer is required to pay, in addition to ordinary wages, extra compensation for the hours worked on public holidays.

In conclusion, this ruling reaffirms that in the presence of continuous seven-day shifts, work can be scheduled on midweek public holidays based on collective bargaining, without requiring an explicit individual agreement, as long as the worker has substantively adhered to such work arrangements.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

20 May 2026

Webinar “May 1st Decree: Key Updates and what’s New” –  HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…

12 May 2026

Legitimate dismissal for false attendance reporting and misuse of access system data (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…