DID YOU KNOW THAT…The repêchage obligation (obligation to relocate) also extends to fixed-term contracts?
Dismissal for a justifiable objective reason is unlawful if the employer does not prove that it has offered the worker lower-level positions, even on a fixed term basis.
Before proceeding with a dismissal for a justified objective reason, the employer must demonstrate that he/she has explored all possible solutions to relocate the worker within the company.
This principle was affirmed by the Italian Court of Cassation, with order no. 18904 of 10 July 2024, thereby reinforcing employers’ repêchage obligations.
Consequently, the Court concluded that dismissal is unlawful where alternative employment positions exist at the time of termination, even in lower or fixed-term jobs, and the employer has not offered these jobs to the employee.
The Court reiterated that the burden of proving that relocation is impossible falls entirely on the employer.
Companies must therefore manage human resources carefully, documenting any attempt at relocation, to avoid a dismissal being held to be unlawful.
On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…
With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…
Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…
“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…
With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…
The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…