Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: Corte di Cassazione, Dismissal, Licenziamento, malattia


13 Oct 2021

Employee Legitimate dismissal due to performing other activities while being absent for illness (Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto – Il Sole 24 Ore, 13 October 2021 – Enrico De Luca, Luca Cairoli)

With its order no. 26709 of 1 October 2021, the Court of Cassation expressed its opinion on the legitimacy of dismissals of workers who are caught carrying out activities incompatible with their medical condition, while being absent for illness.

The Supreme Court ruled on the legitimacy of the dismissal for just cause of an employee (who suffers from acute lumbar and sciatic pain) for keeping a lifestyle incompatible with the disease that afflicted him (the worker was caught lifting and handling bags of soil) while being absent for illness. In addition, this lifestyle was likely to affect his recovery and return to work.

The court reached that conclusion based on the findings of the appointed medical examiner who deduced that the symptoms suffered by the employee would have allowed him to carry out the tasks assigned within the limitations imposed by the company physician. Also the court-appointed expert found that the patient’s activities during his absence due to illness, if they are proved, would have prolonged the period of clinical recovery.

The proportionality assessment of the expulsion sanction was confirmed, as performance of other activities by the employee absent due to illness conflicted with the general duties of fairness and good faith and specific contractual obligations of diligence and loyalty.

The worker appealed to the Court of Cassation, citing the infringement and misapplication of Art. 18, paragraph 4, Law no. 300/1970, as his first ground of appeal, arguing that the conduct carried out during the period of illness constituted mere tasks of daily living (pointing out the modesty of the effort made, which consisted in carrying “two simple bags”). He claimed that the medical condition from which he was suffering should be considered to be proven in the light of the recorded medical certificates.

Continue reading the full version published in Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

20 May 2026

Webinar “May 1st Decree: Key Updates and what’s New” –  HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…

12 May 2026

Legitimate dismissal for false attendance reporting and misuse of access system data (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…