Categories: Insights, Practice

Tag: #dati personali, Privacy


29 Aug 2023

EU-US Data Privacy Framework: new safeguards for the transfer of personal data to the USA

On 10 July 2023, the European Commission adopted an adequacy decision for the EU-US Data Privacy Framework ensuring that the United States of America guarantees an adequate level of protection of personal data comparable to that of the European Union.

The adequacy decision is one of the tools provided for by Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the ‘Regulation’) to transfer personal data from the European Union to third countries that, upon prior assessment by the European Commission, offer ‘an adequate level of protection’, i.e. a level of protection of personal data equivalent to that guaranteed within the EU.

The consequence is that personal data can be transferred securely and can be managed in the same way as data transmissions that take place within Europe.

What does the new EU-US Data Privacy Framework entail?

The EU-US Data Privacy Framework is structured around a self-certification mechanism whereby US companies undertake to comply with a number of personal data protection obligations, including, but not limited to, compliance with the principles of purpose limitation, data minimisation and retention, as well as specific obligations regarding data security and data sharing with third parties.

The organisations’ undertakings will be renewed on an annual basis and are subject to checks and monitoring by the U.S. Department of Commerce, which will process certification applications and periodically verify compliance with the requirements by participating companies.

European citizens will benefit from several independent and impartial remedies in the event that their data is processed in a non-compliant manner, including the newly established Data Protection Review Court (DPRC).

US law will provide a number of safeguards, including limiting access to personal data by public authorities to what is necessary and proportionate to protect national security or to enforce criminal law.

In any case, the Data Privacy Framework will be subject to periodic revisions by the European Commission together with representatives of the European data protection authorities and the competent US authorities.  The first review will take place within one year of the entry into force of the adequacy decision.

The other instruments provided for by the Regulation

It is worth remembering that in addition to the adequacy decision, the Regulation also provides for other tools to ensure the correct transfer of data outside the European Union, including:

  • the adoption of Standard Contractual Clauses;
  • the adoption of Binding Corporate Rules (BCR) by large international groups following negotiations with the supervisory authorities of the countries involved;
  • adherence to specific Codes of Conduct or, in any case, to certification mechanisms which must be simultaneously applied by the entity to whom the data are transferred;
  • the consent of the data subject who must be adequately informed as required by the Regulation itself.

◊◊◊◊

As most recently pointed out in the information note of the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) of 18 July 2023, all the protections provided by the US government in the field of national security apply to all transfers of personal data made to companies in the United States, regardless of the transfer mechanisms used. Therefore, these guarantees also serve to facilitate the use of the other instruments provided for by the Regulation.

Other related insights:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…