Categories: Insights, Case Law


26 Feb 2017

An employer may terminate the union agreement on performance bonus

The Court of Naples, with judgement no. 342 filed on 7 February 2017, ruled that an employer may terminate the company collective agreement concerning the performance bonus provided that such option is included in the original agreement and implemented within the terms agreed between the parties. This is because when a contractual relationship between two parties is established, “it involves the onset of a bond that cannot be broken by unilateral initiative, unless specific contractual expectations are established to provide the parties the power to unilaterally terminate the relationship“. And in the case in question, the agreement, in addition to establishing an initial duration of the bonus, stated that (i) it had to be tacitly renewed from year to year, and (ii) such renewal could be avoided if one of the parties had expressly withdrawn at least four months before the due date with a notice by registered letter with notification of receipt. Thus, the conduct of the employer which, at the expiry date of the agreement does not wish to renew it and gives notice of termination, can only be considered lawful.

 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…