Categories: Insights


15 May 2015

COURT OF CASSATION, 16 MARCH 2015, NO. 5173: DISMISSAL FOR JUSTIFIED REASON ONLY FOR UNFAVOURABLE AND NOT CONTINGENT SITUATIONS

With its ruling no. 5173 of 16 March 2015, the Cassation Court returned to propose an interpretation, regarding the grounds for dismissal for justified reason which are not expressly contained in the law. Article 3 of Italian Law no. 604 of 1966 provides the following definition: “Dismissal for justified reason with notice is determined (…) by reasons connected with production activity, organisation of work and its regular functioning”. With its ruling the Court of Cassation goes beyond compliance with the requirements of the law, adding an additional element: “(…) dismissal for justified reason (…) is determined not by a generic downsizing of the company’s activity, but by the need to proceed to eliminate the job (…) which cannot be merely instrumental for an increase of profit, but must be aimed at facing unfavourable and not contingent situations.” The above principle, which the law of the Supreme Court had already upheld in the past and which is again proposing, we feel may be in conflict with the constitutional principle of free economic activity and the consequent unchallengeable nature of company decisions.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…