Categories: Insights, Case Law


1 May 2017

Court of Cassation: dismissal of working mothers is void

The Court of Cassation, with judgement No. 475, filed on 11 January 2017, intervened in the matter of dismissal of working mothers, stating once again that dismissal ordered to a working mother at the beginning of the pregnancy until her child is one year old is void and ineffective. In the specific case, the Court corrected the decision of the judges ruling on the merits, which, by considering unlawful the dismissal, ordered the employer company to re-hire the worker, or failing to do so, to reimburse her damages in the amount of five monthly salaries equal to the last wage paid. On the matter, according to the Court of Cassation, the Court having jurisdiction had erroneously applied art. 8 of Law No. 604 of 1966, since the “the regulatory measures as per Legislative Decree No. 151 of 2001 do not refer at all to Law No. 604 of 1966 and Law No. 300 of 1970; thus, dismissal is void pursuant to art. 54 of Legislative Decree No. 151 of 2001 and such rule is fully unrelated to the concept of just cause and justified reason”. Consequently, in the case in hand, the relationship must be deemed as never interrupted and the worker has the right to wages since the day of dismissal up to the actual re-admission into service. In other words, during the protected period, employment is ensured.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…