Categories: Insights, Case Law


26 Feb 2017

Dismissal for just cause of an employee consuming corporate goods is lawful independently of the marginal damage suffered by the employer.

The Court of Bologna with judgement no. 149 dated 10 February 2017, declared lawful the dismissal for just cause ordered for an employee who consumed company goods (food and beverages) at the workplace. During the summary case hearing, the Judge of the court where the employee filed the appeal under article 1, paragraph 48, of Law 92/2012, deemed the dismissal unlawful and ordered the employer to pay an indemnity equal to 12 months of salary based on the last remuneration. The Judge of the opposing party, amending the order of the first Judge, with judgement under review, declared the dismissal lawful despite the marginal magnitude of the corporate damage caused, pointing out among other things the following: (i) witnesses reported that the employee was not new to conducts similar to those that led to the dismissal; (ii) the employee denied the alleged facts rather than admitting them; (iii) the position held by the employee (assistant in a department). However, from this judgement it emerges that in assessing the proportionality between the alleged fact and the measures taken, an important consideration is the effect on the employment relationship from a conduct capable of casting doubts on the honesty of any future fulfilment [of the employment role]. This is an indication of a certain behaviour of the worker with regards to the obligations undertaken regardless of the lack of damage or the marginal damage that the conduct may cause.

 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…