Categories: Insights, Case Law


26 Feb 2017

Dismissal for just cause of an employee consuming corporate goods is lawful independently of the marginal damage suffered by the employer.

The Court of Bologna with judgement no. 149 dated 10 February 2017, declared lawful the dismissal for just cause ordered for an employee who consumed company goods (food and beverages) at the workplace. During the summary case hearing, the Judge of the court where the employee filed the appeal under article 1, paragraph 48, of Law 92/2012, deemed the dismissal unlawful and ordered the employer to pay an indemnity equal to 12 months of salary based on the last remuneration. The Judge of the opposing party, amending the order of the first Judge, with judgement under review, declared the dismissal lawful despite the marginal magnitude of the corporate damage caused, pointing out among other things the following: (i) witnesses reported that the employee was not new to conducts similar to those that led to the dismissal; (ii) the employee denied the alleged facts rather than admitting them; (iii) the position held by the employee (assistant in a department). However, from this judgement it emerges that in assessing the proportionality between the alleged fact and the measures taken, an important consideration is the effect on the employment relationship from a conduct capable of casting doubts on the honesty of any future fulfilment [of the employment role]. This is an indication of a certain behaviour of the worker with regards to the obligations undertaken regardless of the lack of damage or the marginal damage that the conduct may cause.

 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…