Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: Licenziamento per giustificato motivo oggettivo


8 Jan 2018

Dismissal justified by objective reasons: redistribution of tasks and increase in profits

The Court of Cassation, with its judgement No. 29238 dated 6 December 2017, ruled once again on the legitimacy of dismissal due to removal of the job position occurred as a result of a reorganisation aimed at increasing the efficiency and profitability of the company. First of all, the Court of Cassation upheld in its entirety the judgement issued by the court of appeals contested by the dismissed worker, giving continuity to its policy according to which a justified objective reason can occur even just with the different distribution of certain tasks among the staff in service, if implemented “with the purpose of a more efficient company management”. In other words, according to the Court, certain tasks can be redistributed among more than one worker, with “the final result of showing the redundancy of the job position of that employee assigned exclusively to that position“. Moreover, in the Court opinion, dismissal for justified objective reasons must not necessarily be due to a company crisis. Indeed, “in order to legitimise individual dismissal for justified objective reasons, the negative economic trend of the company does not constitute a factual requirement that the employer must necessarily prove, it being sufficient that the reasons concerning the productive activity and organization of work, including those aimed at a better management efficiency or an increase in profitability, determine a real change in the organizational structure through the removal of a given job position”.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…