Categories: Insights, Case Law


29 Jan 2017

Dismissal on exceeding the maximum number of sickness absence days

The Court of Cassation, with judgment No. 284 dated 10 January 2017, intervened on the subject of dismissal on exceeding the maximum number of sickness absence days by primarily stating that the calculation must not consider the afternoons during which the worker is subjected to specific medical treatment, when the worker, on a part time basis, has duly performed his/her activities in the morning. In addition, the Court stated – thus following an almost consolidated trend – that this type of dismissal is equivalent to a dismissal for justified objective grounds and not to a disciplinary dismissal. Therefore, it does not need a detailed description of all the elements related to the reasons underlying it (listing of each day of absence, since the total number of absences in a given time period is sufficient). All this without prejudice to the burden by the employer to prove before the Court the facts underlying the dismissal measure. In the same judgment, the Court of Cassation also noted that sending to the employer an illness certificate that covers the workdays during the period when the employee is on holiday leads to a change in the title of absence with their consequent relevance for the calculation of the number of sickness absence days.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…