Categories: Insights


19 May 2015

EMPLOYERS LIABLE FOR NEGLIGENCE IN CASES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL HARASSMENT

With its ruling no. 10037/15, the Court of Cassation returned to make a decision on the issue of psychological harassment and the relative liability of the employer. The Supreme Court connects the employer’s liability for injury from psychological harassment performed by an employee to a form of negligence due to the fact that no measures were adopted aimed at eliminating the performance of the harassing initiatives. The employer’s liability is not excluded in the case where such initiatives were performed by an employer with a higher rank than the victim. The Supreme Court underlined that the duration and reiteration of the persecutory actions, combined with the procedures used by the higher-ranking manager to implement the harassing conduct, were such as to consider that the employer was aware of the hostile initiatives that the victim was subjected to. The phenomenon of psychological harassment has been the subject of many studies and research both from a medical-scientific standpoint, as well as from a strictly legal viewpoint. In terms of the Italian Civil Code, the incidence of harassment on the job is essentially due to violation of article 2087 of the Italian Civil Code. This provision forbids the employer from directly engaging in conduct that is injurious to the psychological and physical well-being of employees, but the employer also has the obligation to prevent, discourage and neutralise any harassing behaviour undertaken by higher ranking employees, people in charge or other employees in performing jobs. In light of the above, we feel it would be useful to stipulate company and/or territorial agreements, including on a voluntary basis, with codes of conduct and ethics as a guide for the conduct of employers – including based on the principles of social responsibility -, of workers and all involved subjects, in order to improve the levels of protection provided by law.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…