Categories: Insights, Case Law


26 Feb 2018

The burden of proving the achievement of the objectives to receive payment of the related bonus rests on the employee

In Judgment no. 1712/2017, the Milan Court of Appeal has dealt with the issue of the omission by the employer of the annual objectives linked to the payment of a bonus. In this case, in the Court’s opinion, the employee claiming payment of the bonus is encumbered with the burden of “… producing and proving his achievement of the objectives that, according to the principles of fairness and good faith in performing a contract, should have been reasonably assigned with a view of continuity with previously set objectives and in relation to the company potential and contingent market conditions”. This is so because the omission in question constitutes contract breach, since the employer is obliged to assign the annual objectives, and does not fall within the scope of application of Article 1359, Italian Civil Code (relied on in the case at hand by the worker) according to which “the condition (editor’s note: achievement of the objectives linked to payment of the bonus) should be considered fulfilled if this was missing for reasons attributable to the party that had no interest in the fulfilment thereof.” This provision – according to the Court – shall apply only in case of a future and uncertain event, on the occurrence of which the effectiveness of an agreement depends. This is so when an employer that has assigned the objectives has engaged in a conduct that prevents workers from achieving them; nevertheless, also in this case, the worker should prove not only the interest of the employer against fulfilment of the condition but also that the objective would have been achieved had the employer not thwarted it.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

20 May 2026

Webinar “May 1st Decree: Key Updates and what’s New” –  HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…

12 May 2026

Legitimate dismissal for false attendance reporting and misuse of access system data (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…