Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: Art. 18, Crediti di lavoro, Legge Fornero


25 Sep 2017

The expiry of the limitation period of wage claims after the Fornero law

With its judgement no. 1091/2017, the Court of Milan has ruled again on the expiry of the limitation period of wage claims, in light of the modifications introduced by Law no. 92/2012 (so-called Fornero Law) to Article 18, Workers’ Charter. In particular, the judgement at hand reiterated that following the entry into force of the Fornero Law, the expiry of the limitation period of wage claims shall be suspended until termination of employment, also in regard to the contracts subject to the regime of novel Article 18, Law no. 300/1970. In fact, the court of first instance has underlined that “it behoves to acknowledge that the entry into force on 18 July 2012 of Law no. 92/2012, which has modified the real guarantee referred to in Article 18, Workers’ Charter, providing, in par. 5 of said Article, for a few instances in which, even in regard to an illegitimate dismissal from work, only a compensatory guarantee remains, with no possibility for the employee to be reinstated, in a similar way to obligatory guarantees (even though with higher compensation amounts)”; consequently, employees may “incur in the fear of dismissal when asserting their rights, in light of a diminished resistance of their stability.” This judgement is consistent with two substantive rulings passed in 2016 by the Court of Milan and by the Court of Turin.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…