Categories: Insights, Legislation

Tag: GDPR


28 Aug 2018

A draft of the Law Decree for the standardisation of the Privacy Code with the GDPR has been approved

On 8 August, a final version of the draft related to the Law Decree “standardising” the Privacy Code (Legislative Decree 196/03) with the European Regulation 679/2016 on the matter of personal data protection (GDPR) has been approved. More specifically, the Decree establishes that the rights of the interested party may be limited or excluded whenever they are in contrast with the needs established by the laws of the State, as in the case of anti-money laundering or whistleblowing. The Decree establishes some specific offences that would not fall under the ne bis in idem principle and would thus be established and penalised according to our regulations. Among others, these are: (i) unlawful processing of the data; (ii) the unlawful disclosure and dissemination of the data undergoing large scale processing; (iii) the fraudulent acquisition of personal data undergoing large scale processing; (iv) the breach of provisions governing remote supervision and employee’s opinion surveys. The draft includes, in addition, that the pending proceedings before the Data Protection Authority not closed at 25 May 2018, may be closed with the payment of two fifths of the minimum penalty within 60 days from the date in which the Decree enters into effect. Instead, concerning future disputes, the offender and the obligated party together may settle the dispute by accepting the ruling of the Data Protection Authority (if issued) and by paying an amount equal to half of the penalty ordered. In addition, the new draft lowers to 14 years old the age when a minor can provide his/her direct consent for activities on social networks or similar platforms (including for marketing and profiling purposes). Last but not least, is the fact that in the first eight months the Data Protection Authority shall keep into account, in order to apply the administrative fines and within the limitations compatible with the GDPR, the application difficulties that will occur in the first months. In the next few weeks the publication is expected on the Official Gazette: the entry into force of the Decree is expected to match the day of the publication.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…