Categories: Insights


26 Jun 2014

EXECUTIVES: OUTSIDE FIXED TERM CONTRACTS THRESHOLD (IL SOLE 24 ORE, JUNE 21, 2014, PAGE 19)

Fixed term contracts entered into with Executives do not account as regards the 20% threshold, introduced by the so-called "Jobs Act". The fact that this rule does not apply to Executives implies, then, that more fixed term employment contracts can be entered into between the Employer and the Executive (subject to the maximum duration of five years), without observing any period of time between one contract and the next and without the Executive being able to request any increase of remuneration in the event of exceeding the maximum duration. Concerning penalties, it is possible to support the exclusion of Executives’ fixed term contracts by the general rule regarding conversion penalty, provided for in Article 5, paragraph 2, but such a contract may be nevertheless deemed converted into an open term contract in accordance with the general principles in judicial proceedings. The right of early termination can always be exercised ante tempus by both parties – i.e. before the natural expiration of the term applied to the contract – in the presence of a just cause. Instead, Executive has the exclusively right to terminate early in case of contracts in excess of three years and provided that at least three years have passed since the beginning of the relationship.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…